[ian@huth]

Erol. the road analogy was one that you introduced and if you look carefully at what you said in it you would realise that it was an invalid argument, but of course I forgot that you cannot be wrong and always have an answer. You have made several statements that are simply untrue but I will not go into them as again, you are always right.

At the end of the day we all know who is responsible for most of the congestion on the net and what they are doing to cause it and no matter what arguments you use it will not alter this fact. There is a certain type of user who is affecting all our use of NTL broadband and that type should either modify their usage to fit in with the AUP (and by that I mean the AUP that existed before the "cap" clause was put in) or move to another provider.

The problem for users is that chaanging ISP may or may not enhance their internet experience and that if it does enhance it it may not be too long before other people see this advantage and jump on the bandwagon with a consequential reduction in service levels if the ISP isn't able to cope with the influx.

Memo to self: Don't respond to Erol's diatribes.