Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Keyser
I think we've done this point to death already
|
Done it to death? King Phoneix and yourself both said that the mail did not come from I-web - end of story. Unfortunately the mail did come from an iweb machine.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Keyser
and you are in a minority.
|
I am in a minority? You mean a minority of people that did not believe the inacurate report here (never corrected btw by those that made the incorrect statements afaik) that the mails did not come from an Iweb machine. They did. You know that, KP knows that and I know that. I guess pointing all this out is just the kind of 'doing it to death' you would rather avoid.
I have to say it is all very NTL'esque really. First response - mislead and misinform (knowingly or unknowingly). When challenged say the matter has been dealt with and no more will be said. Maybe you should consider a job at NTL ?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Keyser
I'm sure I-Web will reply soon to your points but we don't want any more on this subject on this forum. Take it I-Web's forum if you want to argue more.
|
Who is we?
The topic of this thread was Iwebs services.
I am not arguing. I asked a (reasonable imo) question.
Iwebs machines were recently compromised. Not only were they compromised but initialy at least KP (on apperances) did not even realise that the machine had been compromised. Further the hacker appeared to enter the machine, execute their act, and leave without leaving any trace. Asking what they have done about it since is in my view a valid reasonable and on topic question to have asked in the context of the thread. Clearly though it is upsetting to yourself for some reason. So I will not say anymore if you do not.
I have had a (proper) reply to my question and so the question has been asked and answered. Thanks for that 'web junkie' (I assume you are part of the iweb team?).