Quote:
|
Originally Posted by JustAnotherN00b
1GB/day is ok with me, at the moment though only seems to be being enforced on much higher users for the most part.
I've no idea why online media sites take any interest in your point of view to be honest, I guess it's something to fill the column inches with. I find your site wholly amateurish, and you guys lacking in industry knowledge, experience, technical skill, any concept of how to run an ISP properly, and how to run an effective campaign. Erolz appears to have left you which is a shame, he would have been a huge asset, he knows what he's doing, your treasurer does too, shame he's not about more. 
I do like the way ISPreview and Mark J portrayed it like people actually care what you have to say, ditto The Register, there's only 5 of you so not entirely sure why 'a spokesman' talked. '"This is the first time we are aware of any letters being sent out. If these letters had been sent out in any number at all in the past we would have heard about it," he said.' Profound stuff indeed.
Frankly I think Anticap have as much potency as the queue for a Viagra convention, though that is just my opinion  |
You are of course entitled to your view.
Yes Erolz was a loss from the experience point of view. Our treasurer is around when he needs to be.
Increased expertise would be nice so we can argue on a technical as well as consumer level. Of course if there is anyone who wished to assist, we would be pleased to hear from them.
The site as a whole, it is run by consumers of residential ISP services. Inevitably therefore we are amateurs and make no aplogy for that. That is the case of a good many web sites and lobby groups. As this thread has shown, the majority of those who have an interest in a cap policy (whether they are for, against or indifferent to its impostion) will be the consumers whom it might affect. Thus it is only right, in my view that the campaign is run as it is.