View Single Post
Old 20-02-2004, 15:10   #13
SMHarman
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Services: Cablevision
Posts: 8,305
SMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronze
SMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronze
Re: merger even closer??

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chrysalis
this should be illegal in my view
Why then we would have a national cable provider and a national last mile telco provider. A duopoly, the cable can then be marketed far more coherently than at present.

Post merger effeciencies should exist, in time single billing / distribution etc. Marketing wise I think it will be a great benefit. I'm sure post merger there will be a lot of nationwide advertising for cable. If CR3 and the red button, the normally high quality of NTLs phone lines and the higher and more widely dispersed BB oportunities exist, it could be that cable will finally find its feet in the UK and fight back.
SMHarman is offline   Reply With Quote