View Single Post
Old 20-02-2004, 15:03   #11
SMHarman
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Services: Cablevision
Posts: 8,305
SMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronze
SMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronze
Re: merger even closer??

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre
When they bought the franchises they only had to cable a percentage of each franchise not all of it.

Then a few years ago the government said that they didn't have to cable any more if they didn't want to.

Why should they cable unprofitable small populated areas - which is virtually all that is left now.

When the time is right and they have the capitial I'm sure they will start up a limited build program.
Has it ever been discussed whether NTL could pole share and cable these areas above ground on the BT poles (in a similar way to mast sharing for the mobile networks). That would introduce competition in a cheaper manner.
SMHarman is offline   Reply With Quote