Quote:
|
Originally Posted by JustAnotherN00b
I am really defending the principle of it all rather than specifically ntl's current implementation, I'd regard it as something that can be refined, built on, with more granularity. The current 'one size fits all' guideline is ok though while it remains a guideline, which I think it for the most part still is. Should it ever become a hard cap I would hope to see more granularity between tiers, and ways to deal with those who want to use more, either through pay per GB or alternative pricing packages.
Must remember that it's still a guideline not 100% hard limitation for the time being.
|
Fair point and as with Hell's Child we are are very close in our positions in this.
The whole reason this thread re-opened the debate was that the sending out of the letters signified a change in NTL's policy indicating they are now starting to enforce the Cap.
Yes it is still being worded as "guidance" but you surely agree this is a step up from the lack of activity from NTL over the last year.
This is why I and others feel this is the time to do the building and refining of the AUP and are trying to suggest some constructive ways this can be achieved.