Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Kitty
I also had a change of hosts recently and had to redownload the whole site to my pc the upload to the new host while altering the pages a little to remove the old hosts logos. I would be really happy if I had the way to review the SACM that is all I have been after for over a year. I am going to redo my website but need to finish my college course first which involves building a commercial website with all the reports I have to send up on how it was done..
These can need altering it does all add up..
I will finish the course as it is my future I am trying to alter and I had thought NTL would be my ISP when I finished time will tell if they are.
|
Still even this site is unlikely to take up more than 200Mb on the server, so uploading it from one server and downloading to another is not going to take you over the guidance limit (i'm not calling it a cap anymore as no immediate action happens when you hit the guidance limit).
Even then tweaking pages or code is not likely to add more to the bandwidth usage, the databas would be the bulk of the site (at say 150Mb), the images would be uploaded and unless you were changinng the location of them not need moving (or you could use the .htaccess file to redirect).
Pages well best practice is to keep the code to 20-40k so each html tweak will be a tiny element of bwuse.
Its the CS uploades and the WUpdates that will knock you over guidance limits.
Now will NTL ever increase the upload speed. No point in me going from 600 to 1mb as the upload stays the same pedestrian rate i had on my bonded ISDN line. I foolishly thought that cable was a synchronous product which is part of the reason I selected it over ADSL, (along with ISDN number portability problems), but I could upload faster on many dsl products. I'm sure you suffer the same frustration.