Quote:
|
Originally Posted by JustAnotherN00b
They did offer a choice they don't anymore
£27 for 512k BTBroadband, £37 for 1Mbit, 1GB/day guideline
£29 for 512k BTYahoo!, £40 for 1Mbit, 1GB/day guideline
|
I'm possibly being a bit blind, but having just looked through the BTYahoo T&Cs and their User poilcy I cannot find reference to any download restrictions. If you can point me in the direction of where that is laid down, I'd appreciate it as it would affect my judgement on the whole issue, and perhaps my attitude to ntl.
For those who say "off topic", it's on topic because ntl are claiming to be a market leader and thus what they do now, others could consider tommorrow. That's one of the major concerns of anticap. If a player like BT places caps on it's products then the market starts to think it's a practical option and they all follow suit.
There may not be true transparent competition between cable and ADSL services (see my post above), but to joe public there is probably little obvious difference. If caps are a coming thing then as a severe potential restiction in use for the faster tiers, given the "always on" type brandings, ISPs must be obliged under fair trading to make the limitation far more obvious than it is at present. That may be a requirement for the regulators if the industry cannot address that itself.