Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Sociable
Question for you womble.
Do you agree that NTL have an obligation to make sure customers are aware of the nature of the contract they have in as far as restrictions apply?
Yes I do, but Microsoft state they can access you PC in theirs to check all your software is legit, do you use windows?.
Is this obligation increased each time they themselves promote additional services such as on-line gaming and plus?
I agree it should be tiered, 2g for 1m, 1g for 600m etc
And finally how many customers would either leave or more importantly not sign up in the first palce if they actually brought the full implication of the cap to their notice in its current form openly?
Not that many, Not that many people are affected by the cap, trust me. You and the others here are in the minority
If you want to apply limits don't make all the advertsiing give the impression it is an all you can eat service and then rely on an AUP which itself is only an off-shoot of the main T.O.S.
|
I still believe 1gig isn't bad (If the cap is applied sensibly). My wife and my youngest use the PC during the day, and my eldest and myself use it in the evening, and apart from when I download Karate stuff I never hit the limit and I play games most nights