Quote:
|
Originally Posted by BBKing
If it confers the same legal rights as a married heterosexual couple, then it is starting to look very much like marriage, under the 'quacks like a duck' principle. The exact terminology is fairly marginal to the argument though.
|
I disagree. The main thrust of this thread imo, is to keep the marriage ceremony for hetrosexual religious types. It isn't against homosexuals being legally recognised as 'married', for want of a better word, in the eyes of the law and the government. Or have I missed something here? (it's entirely possible
)
btw....I like the 'quacks like a duck bit', that gave me a chuckle