Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jerrek
And that is their right to do so. You may not like it, but you're not a citizen there, so respect it. If you are so opposed to democracy, maybe you should move to the Worker's Republic of Cambodia.
Oh and, I suppose the fact that there is a law preventing sex with minors is just an abuse of a democratic society "legitimise their own bigotry because that is easier than facing up to their prejudice."
Good work.
|
Thank you, you've entirely proven my point as to why some people shouldn`t be allowed to vote. Once again you've conflated entirely irrelevant issues to try and win your argument, and once you start conflating issues in this manner it becomes entirely trivial to dismiss anything your type as irrelevant.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jerrek
Yes there is a clear dividing line between the separation of powers. In that decision, the Supreme Court didn't enact a law, they merely ruled that the law made by Texas is against the Constitution (which it is). You failed to demonstrate how this relates to being not a clear division of power.
|
Mere semantics, at the end of the day the decision of the Supreme Court will be the one that is applied. Ok, so they don`t do the actual applying of the changes themselves, but they are the ones that have decided what changes will be pushed through.