Wow I'm glad I provide excercise for these people who love to jumpt to conclusions!
Quote:
|
Ok, so you say it has nothing to do with your religion
|
No no, read it again. I said it was nothing to do with
the religion. I'm being pushed to answer a question based on whether 'a religion' would accept a gay marriage. I am telling you that I don't care which religion it is, whether or not i would acceopt it is based on whether it falls in to what I'd call the qualification for marriage.
Quote:
|
However, you've already said that in your personal viewpoint this would be wrong, therefore, you are also saying that at least one aspect this religion is wrong.
|
It's all 'therefore this' and 'hypothetical that'. Why don't you just tell me what it is you want me to say? And it surprises you that I consider the aspects of some other religions to be incorrect???
Quote:
|
At some point earlier in this thread you lambasted Kronas for commenting that your religion is wrong, but by following the logical chain of your argument, it would appear that you would actually have no qualms doing the same to another religion if it involved a matter you disagreed with strongly enough.
|
I don't have a problem in anyone thinking I'm wrong, but go back and read the thread (something that certain people don't like doing when discussing such matters with me) and you'll see that Kronas was very direct, confrontational and offensive. His words were "You're wrong". I would never EVER be as insultingly direct to someone with different beliefs to myself, at the very least I'd give reasons why I disagreed with them.
Quote:
|
Can you actually name a (mainstream would be nice) religion that allows such things?
|
Come on, you should know by now that my detractors don't need to something like that!!