View Single Post
Old 05-02-2004, 20:54   #147
Shaun
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,064
Shaun has a nice shiny starShaun has a nice shiny star
Shaun has a nice shiny starShaun has a nice shiny starShaun has a nice shiny starShaun has a nice shiny starShaun has a nice shiny starShaun has a nice shiny starShaun has a nice shiny starShaun has a nice shiny starShaun has a nice shiny starShaun has a nice shiny starShaun has a nice shiny star
Re: In Defense of the Marriage

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerrek
I will not support putting children through that kind of torture.


Quote:
NO. YOU ARE NOT LISTENING-- There are NO RIGHTS. GET IT? NO RIGHTS!
Just because you shout doesn't make it true.

I can't legally sign any medical consent for my partner, or him for me, I am his next of kin, yet I am not allowed this "right"

Another "right" I don't have is being able to leave him my savings or possessions tax free, this is because we aren't "married"

Both of these are rights that I would be given if we were allowed to marry. Personally I wouldn't want to marry, it isn't our style, but I do plan on spending the rest of my life with him and would like the same rights as a heterosexual couple when it comes to these issues. I feel that this is going to come (at least to the UK) soon, and I for one will be glad of that.

As for your way of thinking in the states, I can't take a country (and its views) seriously that can't cope with a flash of a womans breast on their TV yet find violence a routine part of their viewing acceptable. You want to get Richard and Judy over there, she's always getting her boobs out.

Getting back on topic, and to sum up, I WOULD like to have the same rights as a married couple but without it being called or linked to that word. Maybe an official declaration (similar to adoption) that states that I have the right to make decisions about my partners life (should they become too ill to make them their selves), for me this is the main problem at the moment.
Shaun is offline   Reply With Quote