View Single Post
Old 05-02-2004, 19:09   #141
downquark1
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,952
downquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appeal
downquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appeal
Re: In Defense of the Marriage

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ramrod
I think it's more to do with society needing marriage. It is a stable influence on males and increases the likelihood of survival of the offspring (originally)
and with divorces so readily available and these supposed 'open marriages' it seems to be loosing that point.

In response to Jerek why must children be the result of marriage, I don't see it in the contract. I'm sure there have been instances of people aged 80+ getting married, there are no rules against that. Marriage is still binding after the children have left.

Also back to the point of why homosexuals can't raise children just as well anyway?
downquark1 is offline   Reply With Quote