Thread: In Defense of the Marriage
View Single Post
Old 05-02-2004, 13:18   #28
SMHarman
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Services: Cablevision
Posts: 8,305
SMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronze
SMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronze
Re: In Defense of the Marriage
Quote:
Originally Posted by danielf
<snip>Why should a same sex couple that has been together for say 30 years not have the same pension rights as mixed sex married people?
<snip>
Exactly. If that couple is married - not cohabiting.

But why should a heterosexual couple who could have got married (just a quick no fuss legal formality at a registary office) get those benefits when they can already get them by getting married?
SMHarman is offline   Reply With Quote