Thread: Dodgy Processor = High Temperature?
View Single Post
Old 05-02-2004, 11:11   #9
SMHarman
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Services: Cablevision
Posts: 8,305
SMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronze
SMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronze
Re: Dodgy Processor = High Temperature?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alanmelon
Thank you, given that it hasn't exploded yet (touch wood) I thought that might be the case.
Slightly off topic, but bearing in mind price and performance, if I wanted to upgrade the processor (Socket A), what would you recommend the minimum should be for me to appreciate a performance improvement?
Whats the rest of your system - pure Mhz are not the key performance driver anymore. RAM bottlenecks (I see you just bought new), or lack of, or HDD speeds or GPUs all slow things down. What do you want the extra speed for? Games, Video Editing, Database manipulation / queries?
SMHarman is offline   Reply With Quote