Thread: Re-classification Of Cannabis
View Single Post
Old 30-01-2004, 22:33   #123
Stuart
-
 
Stuart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Somewhere
Services: Virgin for TV and Internet, BT for phone
Posts: 26,546
Stuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver bling
Stuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver bling
Re: Re-classification Of Cannabis
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Payer
Yes,of course. ALL dope smokers are brain-addled-idiots without an ounce of common sense!
I believe the following quote backs up was Incog was saying
Quote:
Originally posted on http://www.itv.com/news/429580.html
The study of 100 regular and 90 casual users of cannabis found 74 per cent admitted getting into their cars while under the influence of the drug. This was despite 70 per cent saying they believed that using it had impaired their driving ability.
So, 74 percent of cannabis users have admitted to driving while under the influence. Whether you are aware of it or not, cannabis, as with alcohol, does affect the user's ability to drive.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BillPayer
As for Cannabis being addictive - Bullox!
Yes, I agree, cannabis itself is not addictive. However, under certain circumstances those using cannabis may be persuaded to experiment with something that is addictive. Some Drug addicts I know got started this way.
Stuart is offline   Reply With Quote