Thread: Justice
View Single Post
Old 29-01-2004, 11:26   #82
Ramrod
Inactive
 
Ramrod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Tonbridge
Age: 59
Services: Amazon Prime Video & Netflix. Deregistered from my TV licence.
Posts: 21,960
Ramrod has a golden aura
Ramrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden aura
Re: Justice

Quote:
Originally Posted by Graham
I find it strange that you cannot see that punishment does not necessarily, in and of itself, *stop* crime.
So you are seriously saying that if we removed all punishments for crimes there would be no change to the ammount of crime commited? (since punishment does not stop crime)

Quote:
If it makes you feel any better, let's redefine obliging someone to take part in a rehabilitation scheme as a "punishment". Does that help?
I don't have a problem with a rehab scheme being 'punishment'-for certain crimes, but you seem to have a problem with accepting that criminals need punishment for their crimes.


Quote:
What good is "Justice" if the punishment just makes future crime more likely? It is well known that putting someone into a prison gives an inexperienced offender the opportunity to learn from the "experts" about how to not get caught the next time!
"As the debate stands, citizens are in effect held hostage to threats by the outlaws (ââ‚ ¬Ãƒâ€¦Ã¢â‚¬Å“If you put me in prison, Iââ‚ ¬ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¾Ã‚¢ll just become a worse criminalââ‚à ƒ‚¬Ã‚). "-from the article.
Maby the way to stop them becoming worse criminals in prison is to have them all in solitary....I don't know the answer, neither do you.
Ramrod is offline   Reply With Quote