Thread: 127.0.0.1
View Single Post
Old 28-01-2004, 15:06   #5
rdhw
Inactive
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Cambridge
Posts: 567
rdhw has entered a golden reputation erardhw has entered a golden reputation erardhw has entered a golden reputation erardhw has entered a golden reputation erardhw has entered a golden reputation erardhw has entered a golden reputation erardhw has entered a golden reputation erardhw has entered a golden reputation erardhw has entered a golden reputation erardhw has entered a golden reputation erardhw has entered a golden reputation era
Re: 127.0.0.1

Quote:
Originally Posted by altis
1) Is the sender trying to achieve anything other than tie my router in knots (and if so, how can they expect a reply)?
They certainly will not get a reply to the probe. The intention of the probe might be Denial of Service (crash the router), or maybe a carefully crafted probe, causing the router to reply to its own web configuration interface, might disable the router's security settings so that a later probe could take control of it. If such a thing were possible, it would likely be specific to one model of router.
Quote:
2) Should NTL be passing me packets that have so obviously been spoofed?
It's debatable what ISPs should or should not be doing in this area. NTL have started blocking certain ports which are commonly used by malicious probes, it would be a small extra step to filter out probes from obviously bogus source addresses. But the onus is really on the end-user to protect themselves, and no-one should rely on an ISP to do it for them (as a child might rely on a nanny). NTL's port-blocking can be seen as more of an attempt to prevent their network being overrun by worms, as much as an attempt to help the home user.
rdhw is offline   Reply With Quote