View Single Post
Old 28-01-2004, 15:04   #80
Xaccers
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milling around Milton Keynes
Age: 49
Posts: 12,969
Xaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny stars
Xaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Re-classification Of Cannabis

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sociable
I think this is the point others have been trying to make, cannabis should be treated much the same as alcohol and cigarettes, where the illegality is not in the substance but in its abuse as this applies equally to cannabis for the very reasons you state.

Legalise it, but regulate and tax it on the same basis as alcohol and tobacco.

This is what is being advocated for cannabis, not a "free for all" anything goes attitude, a sensible recognition that, in many ways, cannabis is actually far less harmful to the user than either alcohol or tobacco and even less so when one considers its impact on innocent third parties.

The hypocrisy of government is treating alcohol and tobacco differently simply because they raise vast amounts of money for the exchequer. The hypocrisy of many individuals lies in the fact they smoke or drink themselves, but do not see either as †œdrugâà ƒƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚¬Ã‚ � use.
Why can't you extend that argument to class A drugs though?

As for canibis being less harmful than alcohol or tobacco, you're more likely to get lung cancer from smoking canibis than drinking alcohol or smoking tobacco.
And don't most people smoke canibis with tobacco rather than instead of?
Xaccers is offline   Reply With Quote