View Single Post
Old 28-01-2004, 14:31   #20
SMHarman
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Services: Cablevision
Posts: 8,305
SMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronze
SMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronze
Re: 2004 channel wish list

Quote:
Originally Posted by asdf
ntl isn't full, or at least wont be when analogue is dicontinued.

I don't think it's full now, is it?
To quote Tristan

http://forum.nthellworld.co.uk/showp...26&postcount=2

Quote:
Anyway, is NTL cable full? Yes and no. I think they're in a position whereby it would be too much of a squeeze to add a new channel to the current multiplex structure (it would impact too much on existing channels). I don't know how much space there is left for new muxes; it's entirely possible there isn't any. So they'd have to turn off an analogue channel first, which would actually free up enough space for 10 or so digital channels...

So is it full? It depends on your definition!
So this may require a big hardware investment, requireing cash, which NTL is a little short of - see those Bondholders want it.
SMHarman is offline   Reply With Quote