Thread: Justice
View Single Post
Old 28-01-2004, 12:19   #74
downquark1
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,952
downquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appeal
downquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appeal
Re: Justice

Quote:
That hasn't really got anything to do with the point I was making. I was saying that if a criminal attacks you or enters your home to rob you. He should relinquish his rights because he is knowingly threatening you or your home. So that if you defend yourself or defend your home and he is killed or injured in the process he has no come back and cannot sue you as is the case today.
Fair point, I lost sight of the issue
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre
No, my point is if people offend against society, they should not have a say in how that society is run. They have given up their right by being a criminal.
I think this would be dangerous, it would lead to people digging up dirt on people to destroy their political opinion. A corrupt government could easily manipulate this to reduce opposition.
downquark1 is offline   Reply With Quote