Here's a snip from the log of my NAT router from last night:
Quote:
Tue, 27 Jan 2004 22:41:21 GMT+0000 Unrecognized access from 127.0.0.1:80 to TCP port 1143
Tue, 27 Jan 2004 23:00:34 GMT+0000 Unrecognized access from 127.0.0.1:80 to TCP port 1787
Tue, 27 Jan 2004 23:09:10 GMT+0000 Unrecognized access from 65.35.22.107:3458 to TCP port 17300
Tue, 27 Jan 2004 23:13:01 GMT+0000 Unrecognized access from 68.45.110.12:2755 to TCP port 901
Tue, 27 Jan 2004 23:21:53 GMT+0000 Unrecognized access from 127.0.0.1:80 to TCP port 1515
Tue, 27 Jan 2004 23:42:31 GMT+0000 Unrecognized access from 127.0.0.1:80 to TCP port 1175
Tue, 27 Jan 2004 23:45:18 GMT+0000 Unrecognized access from 211.23.120.65:4372 to TCP port 4899
Tue, 27 Jan 2004 23:50:43 GMT+0000 Unrecognized access from 127.0.0.1:80 to TCP port 1201
Wed, 28 Jan 2004 00:26:51 GMT+0000 Unrecognized access from 65.65.221.2:3767 to TCP port 17300
Wed, 28 Jan 2004 00:41:20 GMT+0000 Unrecognized access from 67.71.46.127:3016 to TCP port 17300
Wed, 28 Jan 2004 00:45:02 GMT+0000 Unrecognized access from 127.0.0.1:80 to TCP port 1303
|
Now I understand that 127.0.0.1 is the network loopback address so how does it end up in the log? At the time, there were no PCs switched on - just the router.
Puzzled...