Thread: Justice
View Single Post
Old 27-01-2004, 09:51   #43
Scarlett
Inactive
 
Scarlett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: St Neots
Posts: 872
Scarlett is the helpful oneScarlett is the helpful oneScarlett is the helpful oneScarlett is the helpful oneScarlett is the helpful oneScarlett is the helpful oneScarlett is the helpful oneScarlett is the helpful oneScarlett is the helpful oneScarlett is the helpful oneScarlett is the helpful oneScarlett is the helpful oneScarlett is the helpful oneScarlett is the helpful oneScarlett is the helpful oneScarlett is the helpful oneScarlett is the helpful oneScarlett is the helpful one
Send a message via MSN to Scarlett
Re: Justice

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerrek
Because it is the same thing in criminal cases.


Clearly, either your brain lacks the neurons needed to understand what I'm saying, or, you just don't *want* to understand. What I said was,

I don't know why liberals always like to assume it is more acceptable to sentence someone falsely to life than to sentence someone falsely to death. Both are equally unacceptable.

Notice the part that read, Both are equally unacceptable.

Also notice that I said that there is no difference between falsely sentencing a man to death or life imprisonment. Both are WRONG.


GET IT?
Obviously you dont want to try and make amends when mistakes have been made.

I agree that both are wrong but if someone is still alive, then at least you can attempt to make things up to them, pay compentsation, let them start to rebuild their lives not much I know but...

Of course if they're dead, the best you could do is appologise to the widow and children for the state sponsered murder.
Scarlett is offline   Reply With Quote