Cable Forum - View Single Post

Jerrek · 27-01-2004, 03:08

Scarlett:

How do you say sorry to a corpse if you find out later on that they were innocent ?
Irrelevant. We're talking justice here, not the judicial process. It is society's job to make sure only those that are guilty are sentenced. I don't know why liberals always like to assume it is more acceptable to sentence someone falsely to life than to sentence someone falsely to death. Both are equally unacceptable.

Losing the right to vote, the problem with that is that you run the risk that once you've been convited once the criminal has nothing to use.
Then so be it. I have no desire to see such **** vote. They will only vote for those who will release them earlier and put them on welfare (which is why 97% of child molestors vote liberal / Democrat), which will be BAD for society.

How many rights do you take away. An old teach of mine said that there are only 2 things that cannot be taken away from you are your qualifications and the right to vote.
I believe I quite clearly stated that you loose your right to vote.

Are you sure that you want to open that door ? picture this, a burgler enters you house. You go at him with a crowbar, you scuffle, during this you end up with your head caved in with the crowbar... you die 2 hours later in hospital.
Good example why you should have used a shot-gun or assult gun.

His defence team offer one defence for your killer, self defence. They are able to show that you must have bought the crowbar to the fight and he was not armed. there fore he acted in self defence and would have run had you not come at him with a crowbar...
No. You cannot claim self-defense if you're already in the wrong. I would have thought that this would be a logical first-step, however, it seems your judicial system has brainwashed you to such a level that I can't even assume such a basic principle. (No offense intended.)

That's a dangerous door to open...
Only for the criminal, and if you're interested in protecting his rights to rob you.

Graham:

Death penalty as a deterrant for murder? Doesn't work.
As far as I remember, no one has ever commited a crime after they've been executed. As for providing a deterrance to other criminals, I don't care. I'm dealing out punishment, nothing else.

27-01-2004, 03:08	#38
Jerrek Inactive Join Date: Jul 2003 Posts: 2,545	Re: Justice Scarlett: How do you say sorry to a corpse if you find out later on that they were innocent ? Irrelevant. We're talking justice here, not the judicial process. It is society's job to make sure only those that are guilty are sentenced. I don't know why liberals always like to assume it is more acceptable to sentence someone falsely to life than to sentence someone falsely to death. Both are equally unacceptable. Losing the right to vote, the problem with that is that you run the risk that once you've been convited once the criminal has nothing to use. Then so be it. I have no desire to see such **** vote. They will only vote for those who will release them earlier and put them on welfare (which is why 97% of child molestors vote liberal / Democrat), which will be BAD for society. How many rights do you take away. An old teach of mine said that there are only 2 things that cannot be taken away from you are your qualifications and the right to vote. I believe I quite clearly stated that you loose your right to vote. Are you sure that you want to open that door ? picture this, a burgler enters you house. You go at him with a crowbar, you scuffle, during this you end up with your head caved in with the crowbar... you die 2 hours later in hospital. Good example why you should have used a shot-gun or assult gun. His defence team offer one defence for your killer, self defence. They are able to show that you must have bought the crowbar to the fight and he was not armed. there fore he acted in self defence and would have run had you not come at him with a crowbar... No. You cannot claim self-defense if you're already in the wrong. I would have thought that this would be a logical first-step, however, it seems your judicial system has brainwashed you to such a level that I can't even assume such a basic principle. (No offense intended.) That's a dangerous door to open... Only for the criminal, and if you're interested in protecting his rights to rob you. Graham: Death penalty as a deterrant for murder? Doesn't work. As far as I remember, no one has ever commited a crime after they've been executed. As for providing a deterrance to other criminals, I don't care. I'm dealing out punishment, nothing else.