View Single Post
Old 26-01-2004, 23:03   #47
Ramrod
Inactive
 
Ramrod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Tonbridge
Age: 59
Services: Amazon Prime Video & Netflix. Deregistered from my TV licence.
Posts: 21,960
Ramrod has a golden aura
Ramrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden aura
Re: Re-classification Of Cannabis

Quote:
Originally Posted by Graham
Quoting from Ramrod's "Australian" link:

'A spokesman for National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, Paul Dillon, said: "The problem with a piece of research like this is it can be hijacked by people who would say one puff of cannabis will lead you straight to other drugs."'

And that, I think, says a lot...
He would say that, he is anti-the research (for some reason or other), and it's hardly a rebuttal of the research is it? It's a bit like saying that the problem about this photo of the blue sky is that some people will say that it proves the sky is blue .
Interesting that you jumped on that bit rather than anything else in the piece.




....on a lighter note, this is the tories response to the legislation
Quote:
A Downing Street spokesman, speaking on condition of anonymity, told our reporter that there was absolutely no truth in a rumour that Prime Minister Blair's incessant smile was anything other than naturally induced.
Ramrod is offline   Reply With Quote