Quote:
|
Scientists say, "we have evidence to say that this or that happened 50 millions years ago until someone else proves different".
|
Um no, they say "Stone age man burped then scratched his bum" instead of "It is believed Stone Age man etc".
Using scientific principles (which demands proof beyong reasonable doubt) is unlikely to produce anything which will sway the world's view of the Bible. But science and religion are made up of two very different foundations - proof and faith. Christians don't require proof, we go along with what we feel is right and more often than not, is something we have a personal experience of.
Quote:
|
oh and we have this ambiguous storybook full of chinese whispers and contradictions to prove it
|
Just to clarify - I don't get my faith from the Bible - which is just a book. I neither worship it or kneel before it. My inspiration comes from God and through Jesus.
Quote:
|
PS BTW: It's "Cavalry" not "Calvery". Calvery is what illiterate american people say instead of the word cavalry. On the otherhand "Calvary" is a a place in Utah (a US state which is probably the worst possible place in the western world for a non-christian to live).
|
oooOOOoooo!! And if a frog had wings then it wouldn't bump it's ass each time it hopped!
Quote:
|
However, one can increase the ambiguity though and Russ is certainly doing a fine job of that.
|
Nah!!
