View Single Post
Old 12-01-2004, 11:50   #21
abailey152
Inactive
 
abailey152's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: In hiding!
Services: 60Mb VM BB Sky+HD
Posts: 725
abailey152 has a brilliant futureabailey152 has a brilliant futureabailey152 has a brilliant futureabailey152 has a brilliant futureabailey152 has a brilliant futureabailey152 has a brilliant futureabailey152 has a brilliant futureabailey152 has a brilliant futureabailey152 has a brilliant futureabailey152 has a brilliant futureabailey152 has a brilliant futureabailey152 has a brilliant future
Send a message via MSN to abailey152 Send a message via Yahoo to abailey152
Re: Norton Firewall slooows connection?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kedoo
If you have allready bought NAV 2004 then yes it will run a little better on the faster system obviously, but if you are shopping around and need advice on the best one to use, then go Mcafee...
I'd agree with that regarding the anti-virus alone. McAfee is quicker and less resource hungry, but I tried their firewall and was not impressed at all.

I like Norton's firewall, so I tend to run NAV as they tie together (in NIS). I used to run an old version of McAfee and ZoneAlarm but started getting grief when I moved to XP. I then tried Kaspersky AVP...arrrggghhh!!!! Nothing but problems! As I said, I've tried the new McAfee and was impressed by the AV but not the firewall. I also tried the two products included with Ontrack Systemsuite. The firewall didn't impress, and the AV (Trend) missed a trojan (fully updated btw), so I then tried Norton. Yes it does slow the system down, but it seems to get along with everything I run, and it doesn't seem to miss anything.

And that's the key, I think. It depends a lot on what you are running as to what suits.
abailey152 is offline   Reply With Quote