View Single Post
Old 08-01-2004, 18:26   #52
greencreeper
Inactive
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Leeds - the dog house
Age: 49
Services: Email me for a current price list
Posts: 8,270
greencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny star
greencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny star
Re: How should NTL handle spam ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by threadbare
spam isnt going to go away - it is pretty much here to stay. ntl have the right idea, other ISP's use similar methods to block spam.
Well that's the sort of attitude that allow spammers to keep on spamming If NTL could guarantee that they would never delete an email as spam and would only mark emails as spam and would be at least 90% accurate in doing so, then I would be happy. What I know for certain is that if and when NTL start dealing with spam there will be people on here complaining about lost emails and/or emails marked as spam. And it'll be the same people who wanted NTL to deal with spam. NTL make a mess of everything. This we know. So why people want NTL to manage their inboxes I don't know!


john
greencreeper is offline   Reply With Quote