Quote:
|
Originally Posted by themelon
ntl is catching up in all areas in my opinion, but I will never get you too agree so wheres the point.
snip
|
I fully agree that some users will find no problems with NTL and are really happy with them. I used to think that my 96 baud (yes 96, not 96K) modem was brilliant and was over the moon with it. A lot of people draw comparisons between services without seeing them running side by side over a lengthy period. My comparisons have been made having both NTL and Sky DTV, NTL and BT telephone and NTL BB running side by side here for a lengthy time and using an ADSL connection each day.
I would welcome your ideas on where NTL is catching up in order that I can make an evaluation as to whether I agree with you or not. If you provide the evidence then I can do nothing but agree with you. Failure to provide the evidence is an admission that you are wrong.
I would love NTL to get its act together and supply the kind of service that only cable can and at a competitive price, but they are not doing this. When they do they will have my custom for sure.
By the way, what do you use for TV reception when the NTL service goes down. If the answer is "it never does" then imagine that it did, what would you use?