View Single Post
Old 05-01-2004, 15:47   #16
Bifta
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Eglinton, Co. Derry
Posts: 7,640
Bifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny star
Bifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny star
Re: Reducing image file size?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sociable
True if you need to preserve very high quality for future printing etc but can be ideal for sending a copy of the latest snaps of "Junior" to auntie flow in OZ.
Then you're still better off using a jpeg. a 1600 x 1200 full colour image (from your average 2.1 megapixel digital camera) if saved as a full sized 256 colour gif will end up around 700k, a 40% compressed jpg (which is still better quality than the gif) will be less than 300k.

Below is an example (pictures courtesy of my local beach ) the jpg is around 20k .. the same picture saved as a gif is 162k
Bifta is offline   Reply With Quote