View Single Post
Old 02-01-2004, 22:28   #13
Paul
Dr Pepper Addict
Cable Forum Admin
 
Paul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Nottingham
Age: 63
Services: IDNet FTTP (1000M), Sky Q TV, Sky Mobile, Flextel SIP
Posts: 30,568
Paul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered stars
Paul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered stars
Re: Transparent cache absolutely dismal

Quote:
Originally Posted by rdhw
Well, partly. The other factor is that, when you set an explicit proxy, you use only that proxy, for all your traffic. When you do not configure an explicit proxy, your traffic gets allocated to one of a local cluster of proxies, chosen on the basis of the requested HTTP address. If one proxy of the cluster is sick, you notice poor performance on all the addresses that it handles. When you configure an explicit proxy, you probably choose a different member of the cluster (one that is working normally). This is why it often appears that explicit use of a local proxy works when the default transparent does not. If you were to check out every member of the local cluster, you would probably find which one(s) were sick and which were fine.
Interesting, I didn't know it was address based (or IP based ?) allocation. What device actually makes the decision and routes you to the appropiate machine ?
__________________

Baby, I was born this way.
Paul is offline   Reply With Quote