View Single Post
Old 22-12-2003, 16:07   #57
Stuartbe
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jan 2023
Posts: 4,984
Stuartbe is an unknown quantity at this pointStuartbe is an unknown quantity at this point
Stuartbe is an unknown quantity at this pointStuartbe is an unknown quantity at this pointStuartbe is an unknown quantity at this pointStuartbe is an unknown quantity at this pointStuartbe is an unknown quantity at this pointStuartbe is an unknown quantity at this pointStuartbe is an unknown quantity at this pointStuartbe is an unknown quantity at this pointStuartbe is an unknown quantity at this pointStuartbe is an unknown quantity at this pointStuartbe is an unknown quantity at this pointStuartbe is an unknown quantity at this pointStuartbe is an unknown quantity at this pointStuartbe is an unknown quantity at this pointStuartbe is an unknown quantity at this pointStuartbe is an unknown quantity at this pointStuartbe is an unknown quantity at this pointStuartbe is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Merged - Port blocking

Quote:
Originally Posted by pem
Well I thought that the reply implied who (i.e. me).

Define "not secure" and "unstable" - and who says it was written for use on a Lan ? (and the "internet" is basically just a big Lan anyway)

JFYI - it is perfectly secure enough for my use of it and I have never had a file transfer fail.
Hi pem.

It was written for use in a internal network only. Have a look at the RFC for netbios and file & printer sharing. This is why any routers in an autonamous network will stop these protocols travaling outside the network unless it is programed otherwise.

I know the guy has a bit of a big head but Gibson of www.grc.com has done a great deal of research on netbios. There is also a good paper on the subject at http://www.petri.co.il/what_is_port_445_in_w2kxp.htm

Looks like we may have to agree to disagree on this one
Stuartbe is offline   Reply With Quote