Thread: Cricket The General Cricket Thread
View Single Post
Old 13-09-2005, 12:52   #397
Downloads
Inactive
 
Downloads's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Norwich
Posts: 906
Downloads has entered a golden reputation eraDownloads has entered a golden reputation eraDownloads has entered a golden reputation eraDownloads has entered a golden reputation eraDownloads has entered a golden reputation eraDownloads has entered a golden reputation eraDownloads has entered a golden reputation eraDownloads has entered a golden reputation eraDownloads has entered a golden reputation eraDownloads has entered a golden reputation eraDownloads has entered a golden reputation era
Send a message via ICQ to Downloads Send a message via MSN to Downloads
Re: Cricket

Quote:
Originally Posted by Graham
Sorry? Exactly how do you come to the conclusion that I know nothing about cricket?

Simply because I'm not so blindly jingoistic that I can forgive the lamentable performances of certain English players?

eg Pieterson may have done well with the bat, but if he'd held a few more catches in earlier matches we could have had this properly sewn up already.
Yeh, you are like, so right, i think we should drop Pieterson for being England's highest scoring batsman. Dropping 6 catches pales into comparison when playing a final innings like he did. That's why you know nothing about cricket, because players themselves and people in the game who know far more than you don't voice the sam opinions as yours.

If certain players were lementable then what does that say about the Ausies, i'm an analyst and stats NEVER lie, we were the better team, fact.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cric...es/default.stm

This link supports my case. It doesn't say every player was brilliant, but it does tell you that you are wrong and the Australians didn't play better, fact.
Downloads is offline