![]() |
Militant cyclists
I like to cycle myself in the summer
but I can't stant those militant ones you see in the traffic dayglo stipes everywhere - helmet - po-faced - you know the sort saw one this morning whacking the side of a car for no apparent reason |
Re: Militant cyclists
Agreed - as a cyclist myself I'm embarrased by the actions of some of them - Cycling Nazis I call them. Smothered in day-glo lycra!
|
Re: Militant cyclists
Quote:
they seem to think that all car drivers are one and the same - they are "car-ist" |
Re: Militant cyclists
Quote:
|
Re: Militant cyclists
I think there should be a law brought into place regarding cyclists.
Currently they are the ONLY road user not required to pass a test before using the road, not required to have their vehicle inspected annually and therefore not responsible for problems they cause. Cyclists should have to take a Cycling Proficiency test to ride on the roads, to show they have SOME road sense, Their cycles should be inspected annually and some form of MOT issued, also they should carry license plates. Age shouldn't be a limitation on whether they use the cycle on the road, but a basic road knowlege would not go amiss. Why should every other road user be bound by the laws of the road and them be free to do as they please? They are THE most vulnerable road user, and yet they are in some (not all) cases the ones responsible for the accidents they are involved in. Ignoring road signs, riding at night with no form of lighting, bald tyres which only get changed when the cloth wears through, swerving without notice or just generally unstable on a bike. To ride a motorcycle a test is compulsory, as is an annual check to ensure the vehicle is safe (at least at the time of the test) Same for a car. Why not for a cycle? Example - a cyclist rides out of a sidestreet without warning, you hit your brakes, a car runs up the back of you... The car that hit you is at fault, The cyclist gets away from the scene and you have no way of establishing who it was, no number plate, generic cycle and no eyewitnesses can identify them. The cyclist caused the accident, yet cannot be found. This needs to be redressed. |
Re: Militant cyclists
and there is the issue of 3rd party insurance. If a cyclist rides into my car, why the heck should I have to claim on my insurance as cyclists dont have any?
|
Re: Militant cyclists
Quote:
or you are driving quite legally down the road and a bike appears in front of you , you hit it and the father comes out and bawls you out for hitting there kid even though they were in the wrong :( , then you have a damaged car without it being your fault , because the kid is not insured you cant do a thing about it :afire: :afire: :afire: , been there done that :( salu beat me to it :( |
Re: Militant cyclists
cycling through red lights is half the fun of summer cycling
I don't see a problem with that as long as you are not too reckless or are wearing a naff luminous strip also - it's an excellent way to get back from the pub since they stopped everybody going down there in cars its this bicycle clipped - covered in accessories - kagoule wearing type that irritates me one whacked my car as I passed him once - I stopped and asked him what he thought he was upto - he then flew into a rage about me being too close to him - silly b@stard - probably worked in local government - I could sense it |
Re: Militant cyclists
Is it in Holland where the cyclist is NEVER deemed to be responsible for an accident?
The vehicle driver is ALWAYS at fault. :cry: |
Re: Militant cyclists
my response would have been "I have a license which proves I have a working knowlege of the highway code, where is yours?"
|
Re: Militant cyclists
Quote:
It's difficult enough cycling in this weather, rain blinds you, gusty wind causes you to wobble, glass in the gutter (which is where we have to cycle !) causes you to avoid it, not to mention those 'local govt workers' who pull right over to the kerb when a car is turning right in front so you can't get past. Yeh like they are gonna get through !! :afire: Quote:
Cyclists are generally amongst the safest of road users (with a few notable exceptions !) .....they have to be to stay alive. Think who comes off worst in an accident between car / lorry / bus and a bicycle ???? Only two days ago I had to swerve and brake because a car cut a corner on me. My front wheel hit an ice patch and now I sport a badly grazed knee, shin and pride plus one pedal is slightly out of 'skew'. Not much I grant you, but the driver was blissfully unaware of what they had done and carried on in their nice cosy car listening to the radio no doubt !! :mad: |
Re: Militant cyclists
Quote:
|
Re: Militant cyclists
Cyclists should pay road tax
Cyclists should have 3rd party insurance Cyclists should pass a highway code test Cycles should have a road worthyness certificate Cycles for road use should have lights lights Cyclists that cyle on the footway should be fined Cyclists that mount the footway and cycle round traffic lights should be fined. (if they dismount and walk their cycles that's OK) Cyclists that drink and cycle should be fined If cyclists want to use our roads they should observe the laws of the road and contribute to their maintenance. I own a Car and Motor bike and have to pay tax on both, so why should cycles be taxed?? |
Re: Militant cyclists
Quote:
And before you say anything: NO I was not cycling on the pavement and YES I did have lights on. |
Re: Militant cyclists
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 20:21. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum