Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Virgin Media Internet Service (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=12)
-   -   ntl DHCP changes (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=45509)

jtwn 04-04-2006 03:12

ntl DHCP changes
 
Anybody noticed the difference?

James Henry 04-04-2006 03:51

Re: ntl DHCP changes
 
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/...08022eba7.html

Paul 04-04-2006 09:50

Re: ntl DHCP changes
 
Not really, what do you mean ?

Neil 04-04-2006 10:28

Re: ntl DHCP changes
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jtwn
Anybody noticed the difference?

Could you be a bit more vague please?

jtwn 04-04-2006 13:22

Re: ntl DHCP changes
 
The 'cust' part now doesn't appear to relate to your address anymore.

I wonder if you can still even force an IP change by changing a connected device's mac address.

---------- Post added at 12:22 ---------- Previous post was at 11:06 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by James Henry

Are you trying to say something? Thats why my new address doesn't have a cable number, or at least a positive one?

Graham M 04-04-2006 13:31

Re: ntl DHCP changes
 
Thats a DNS change more than a DHCP change then.

rdhw 04-04-2006 15:52

Re: ntl DHCP changes
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jtwn
The 'cust' part now doesn't appear to relate to your address anymore.

Yes the 'cust' part does still relate to your IP address, but not in the obvious way that previously applied. Previously, each customer-side interface to the CMTS (or uBR), as identified by card and cable number, had its own set of IP subnet ranges, each usually quite small, for instance with a netmask of 255.255.255.0. In that system, the custXXX element of the DNS name was identical to the final octet of the IP address.

In the new system, many interfaces on a single CMTS have been bundled together for the purposes of IP address allocation, resulting in fewer and larger IP subnets spanning several CMTS interfaces. A strong motivation to do this is to economise on the number of IPv4 addresses wasted and unusable when many small subnets are used. Better utilisation of the increasingly scarce IPv4 addresses can be achieved with fewer larger subnets.

For instance, my connection to Cambridge UBR 8 now has a netmask of 255.255.252.0, a subnet of size 1024 instead of the previous size of 256. The gateway address has become 82.6.104.1 (instead of being a .254 address). User IP addresses are available from 82.6.104.2 (DNS cust1) through to 82.6.107.254 (DNS cust1021). The correspondence between IP address and the DNS custXXX element is still there, if you do the sums.

jtwn 04-04-2006 16:44

Re: ntl DHCP changes
 
Ah right, I now understand, thankyou for your explanation.

The link you posted James Henry didn't register the first time round ;)

Chrysalis 04-04-2006 23:53

Re: ntl DHCP changes
 
this might be what happened to me last week when my ip changed then. My current subnet is a 252.

monkey2468 05-04-2006 01:45

Re: ntl DHCP changes
 
Does this make it easier to reseg after the addition of new cards to the UBR?

BBKing 05-04-2006 09:53

Re: ntl DHCP changes
 
Thanks rdhw for a concise and full explanation as ever, that's precisely how it works

monkey2468 - yes, it means less work for the lads on the night, less to go wrong, fewer scopes on DHCP servers (which saves memory and increases capacity). The real driver, however, is private IP addresses, as you use them more efficiently and there's a finite number available.

The cust number is still related to your IP address, except that it's not obvious if you write the IP in human-readable dotted quad form! It works brilliantly in binary...

monkey2468 05-04-2006 09:57

Re: ntl DHCP changes
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BBKing
Thanks rdhw for a concise and full explanation as ever, that's precisely how it works

monkey2468 - yes, it means less work for the lads on the night, less to go wrong, fewer scopes on DHCP servers (which saves memory and increases capacity). The real driver, however, is private IP addresses, as you use them more efficiently and there's a finite number available.

The cust number is still related to your IP address, except that it's not obvious if you write the IP in human-readable dotted quad form! It works brilliantly in binary...

Doesn't everyone think in binary? (damn those inplants ;) )


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 15:39.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum