![]() |
Moon plan 'comes up short
|
Re: Moon plan 'comes up short
I think we need to develop a safe and economical orbiter (shuttle replacement), to service and expand the International Space Station, then develop a vehicle that will operate from that.
I totally agree with the article, that the 'heavy lifter' approach is redundant (and wasteful) technology. This, in my opinion, is 'short term-ism' that is not justified by the goal. A moon colony is no more than 'nice to have', at the moment, why not set our sights on the longer term project of a manned mission to Mars? |
Re: Moon plan 'comes up short
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The Space Station may be a great place to launch from, but it's awfully small for storage. So much easier to dump supplies on the Moon and then ferry them up to the SS as required. |
Re: Moon plan 'comes up short
I think they (NASA) have realised that they better really go and land on the moon and put the stuff they are supposed to have left there in the right places before someone else gets there and exposes them LOL
|
Re: Moon plan 'comes up short
Quote:
|
Re: Moon plan 'comes up short
Quote:
|
Re: Moon plan 'comes up short
Quote:
|
Re: Moon plan 'comes up short
oh no, what have i started :)
|
Re: Moon plan 'comes up short
I would love to nip to the moon before the USA gets there again, and place a DFS sale leaflet, and a solar powered high power hifi playing the Jamster advert.
|
Re: Moon plan 'comes up short
I'ld send the Blooming frog
|
Re: Moon plan 'comes up short
Quote:
|
Re: Moon plan 'comes up short
Quote:
|
Re: Moon plan 'comes up short
Quote:
|
Re: Moon plan 'comes up short
LOL has to be one don't there ;)
|
Re: Moon plan 'comes up short
Quote:
(With apologies to Terry Pratchett! :) ) |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 07:57. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum