Cable Forum - Morganatic marriage

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)

- Lifestyle (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=22)

- - Morganatic marriage (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33713800)

Morganatic marriage

How do you know if a marriage is morganatic?

Re: Morganatic marriage

how does that even matter in 2026 thought we were meant to live in a classless society

Re: Morganatic marriage

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jaymoss (Post 36213681)

how does that even matter in 2026 thought we were meant to live in a classless society

Evidently not. Modernity is a myth.

Hierarchies are fundamental, have always existed in human societies, and will continue to exist for as long as there are humans.

Alfred Adler, the Austrian academic and psychotherapist has written about the universal nature of the superiority complex and inferiority complex.

Accordingly, the inferiority complex is fundamentally more important than the flip-side, which is just a superficial mask to hide the former. People have always manufactured their outward superiority complexes as a coping mechanism to navigate their anxieties, insecurities, and sense of inferiority.

Consequently, the inferiority complex can give rise to two-distinct types of envy:

Benign
2. Malicious

For the sake of argument, this article is only concerned about the latter, which always entails a social cost due to its malevolent and destructive nature: "If you can't beat them, join them", but the opposite is just as true.

Benign envy might galvanise a jealous person towards self improvement in order to overcome their anxiety, insecurity, and inferiority complex, but self improvement is not always an option, so that the inferiority complex will be manifested as a malicious envy instead.

The latter is always manifested as a desire to destroy what another person has, denial of their accomplishments, or sabotaging their superior work such as to alleviate a jealous person's sense of inferiority.

Consequently, a jealous person will often use the above methods to attack the target of envy if only to reduce their pain on a temporary basis.

It is like an obsessive-compulsive disorder whereby a sufferer is addicted to attacking the target of envy to alleviate their own suffering until such time as they require yet another 'fix'.

Their addiction is like a vicious never ending cycle:

Stalking
2. Arranged marriage
3. Online abuse

Thus, the highest echelons of the ruling class will often use their resources to arrange their child's marriage as a means to attack their target of envy based on their assumptions that a Morganatic marriage might provide a permanent solution to counterbalance their sense of inferiority.

In the specific context of a Western society, it usually entails marriage to a coloured person or the lower echelons of the white community, and the latter is always a contingency in case their child rejects the former option.

A Morganatic marriage, by definition, will usually involve the pairing of people who are fundamentally different in terms of their social, cultural, ethnic, or racial heritage based on the most flimsy excuses, such as them living in the same town, or the subjective comparison of people who are fundamentally different in terms of their socioeconomic status.

Such covert operations by the government and their elite financial backers are bound to be criminal or at least a tortious liability of one form or another.

Ultimately, it seems that not everyone will be agreed upon what comprises a Morganatic marriage or doesn't, and not everyone will be agreed about the specific circumstances that would give rise to a non-traditional marriage.

So, of course the controversy of a Morganatic marriage is still a relevant concern to our supposedly 'modern' society because the question itself is still fundamental to the hierarchy for as long as humans will continue to exist.

Re: Morganatic marriage

yea I do not care about any of that stuff

Re: Morganatic marriage

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jaymoss (Post 36213685)

yea I do not care about any of that stuff

You might be concerned about the incessant stalking, defamation, or interference.

Why does the law even exist?

Re: Morganatic marriage

Quote:

Originally Posted by David Mitchell (Post 36213686)

You might be concerned about the incessant stalking, defamation, or interference.

Why does the law even exist?

By a Male or Female?

Or is it only Men that do it . . .

Re: Morganatic marriage

Never given it a thought about it , just hoping I forget it soon.

Re: Morganatic marriage

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36213696)

By a Male or Female?

Or is it only Men that do it . . .

Your question is more a statement of fact than a question. Obviously, the attackers are both male and female, but thanks for the reminder. Consequently, they are a microcosm of the wider society, and will be assigned different roles in terms of the three attack strategies.
However, I contend that the mastermind is still a finite group from the elite, and are always outnumbered by their minions (or proxies) who will do their bidding, and will carry out their stalking activities online (#3) or vis-a-vis (#1), and their stalking activities are always carefully conceived and orchestrated by the mastermind. Nothing is ever left to chance so that social comparison theory doesn't give rise to a much more widespread problem that is uncontrollable. But the problem can still be realistically controlled simply by eliminating a finite group of people from the elite.
The hypothetical finitude of the mastermind implies that the three attack strategies might be defeated by specifically targeting the mastermind instead of the proxy, despite the fact that everyone is guilty and should be killed for their sins (Romans 6:23; Ezekiel 18:4). Both the mastermind and their proxy are guilty of the same crime and should be killed for their sins, but it might be better to prioritise taking down the mastermind instead of their minions, given the scarcity of time and resources available.
Both the mastermind and their proxy will have the same agenda, which is to take the target down a peg or two in order to alleviate their own sense of inferiority. Otherwise, they are unlikely to coordinate the covert operations by working together as a team (or a gang) unless they specifically had the same agenda. Thus, Keir Starmer was definitely right to say that none of the minions have any choice about their "obsessive-compulsive disorder", but it's never because they were coerced by the government into working for the elite.
Presupposing the finitude of the mastermind, the causality of attack might be eliminated by killing all the elite members who are behind the stalking.
Assuming that the mastermind are multiple individuals per stalking incident, every culpable member of the elite can be eliminated by specifically examining the proxy to infer the multiple identities of the mastermind: (a) time (b) date (c) place (d) proxy description.
By using the substitution logic of algebra and the information at hand (a, b, c, d), you should be able to infer the respective identities of mastermind 1, mastermind 2, and mastermind 3 (etc.) in order to have them concomitantly killed by the weapon of your choosing.
Now, the people in MI5's counter terrorist unit (PSYOP) are still motivated by malicious envy as much as anybody else (Gordon Brown, Rowan Williams, Justin Welby, and Stephen Cotterell, etc.), but their modus operandi is to sabotage the protagonist's superior work, knowing that their own work is vastly inferior.
Both a working-class husband and his wife might insist on your arranged marriage with their daughter as an alternative means to drag you down. Because the mastermind is clearly against the idea of the target having a strategic marriage with a member of the British aristocracy. Such a marriage cannot alleviate their sense of inferiority on a permanent basis. For only marriage with the lower orders can alleviate their sense of inferiority in the long-term.
Knowledge of #1 to #9 should enable a defender to successfully navigate the war zone described, and to eliminate the attackers once and for all.

Re: Morganatic marriage

Quote:

Originally Posted by David Mitchell (Post 36213672)

How do you know if a marriage is morganatic?

Since I have no clue what "morganatic" is, I dont.

How do I know you're real, and not some AI bot ?

(Esp given your posting from a UK based Amazon server).

Re: Morganatic marriage

Give him another few days and he'll be offering us his exclusive and highly efficient legal services . . for a price.

He'd get more interest on here if he posted about what he'd had for dinner, anything he's fixed lately, or the annoyance of having to drive 27 miles to save 1p on a litre of petrol :D

Re: Morganatic marriage

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36213738)

Are you the editor of U75 by any chance?