![]() |
The chagos agreement
I think that this topic merits a thread of its own.
The British press have cooked up a potential threat of the UK being sued by Mauritius for billions of GBP should the Chagos deal collapse. "Amusing" in terms of Starmer that this prospect might be, the Agreement seems to me, at least, watertight against liability if the deal collapse. Highlighted text in the quotes are mine. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
So, you can see that the Agreement is not in force and there is thus no legal basis for a claim against the UK (in my opinion, at least). It may be that Mauritius will see it differently and that an International Court could side with Mauritius because they hate the UK. So - there's plenty of fun yet to be had. |
Re: The chagos agreement
I'll be honest here, I've taken no real interest in whatever is happening with these islands.
Am I right in thinking we're handing them over and then paying some kind of 'rent' to continue to use them? Why would we want to rent something that *according to the experts* will be 4ft underwater in the next few years :D |
Re: The chagos agreement
Quote:
|
Re: The chagos agreement
Quote:
|
Re: The chagos agreement
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 16:01. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum