![]() |
London's Marble Arch 'Mound' disaster
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-58197626
Quote:
They wanted to get more people to Oxford Street whose stores are struggling due to the general decline in in-person shopping and because the more attractive Regent Street is taking all the top-end retail stores. Oxford Street is full of traffic and crappy (and rather suspicious) American Candy Stores. For as long as I can remember people have been pleading for Oxford Street to be pedestrianised. Make into a massive street where you can have plants, tables outside for cafes and pubs, and lots of room for people to shop rather than being crammed into crowded pavements next to vehicles. People hate Oxford Street because there is no room to move and lots of traffic. So what do they do? Build a massive pointless hill at the end of it at a cost of £6 million. Idiots. |
Re: London's Marble Arch 'Mound' disaster
Quote:
|
Re: London's Marble Arch 'Mound' disaster
Maybe they'll shove a wind turbine on it now . . or a big statue . . . or some rabbits . . or spend another £4 million flattening it :shrug:
|
Re: London's Marble Arch 'Mound' disaster
Westminster Council need to listen for once instead of coming up with these stupid ideas. It's so obvious what the problems with the area around the West End are and they don't address them. They don't try to make Oxford Street a nicer place to shop, they don't do anything about the weird amount of vape, American candy and crappy souvenir shops that pop up and close down constantly
|
Re: London's Marble Arch 'Mound' disaster
Quote:
|
Re: London's Marble Arch 'Mound' disaster
Quote:
|
Re: London's Marble Arch 'Mound' disaster
Quote:
London rent is expensive. You have these American candy shops more commonly appear than a Pret or Starbucks does and no one is ever in them. Private Eye did a piece on it: https://www.reddit.com/r/london/comm...ouvenir_shops/ Something weird is going on. |
Re: London's Marble Arch 'Mound' disaster
Quote:
|
Re: London's Marble Arch 'Mound' disaster
Quote:
Why not reduce the rent so it's now affordable? You would then potentially have to reduce everyone's rent and you may have some honest tenants locked into expensive arrangements. |
Re: London's Marble Arch 'Mound' disaster
Westminster Council says it hoped to get 200,000 visitors a day. If the mound is open 12 hours a day that's 276 people per minute, more than four a second.
Someone at Westminster has definitely been using Priti Patel's calculator, that is clearly impossible! |
Re: London's Marble Arch 'Mound' disaster
According to the BBC article above
"Organisers had hoped the mound would attract 200,000 ticketholders ... before it is taken down in January." Which seems more plausible |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 17:02. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum