Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Loyalty costs many a lot (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33707183)

Taf 19-12-2018 10:46

Loyalty costs many a lot
 
Quote:

Loyal customers are being "ripped off" for mobile, broadband, savings, home insurance and mortgage deals.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-46596162

Mr K 19-12-2018 11:48

Re: Loyalty costs many a lot
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Taf (Post 35976036)

No surprise to anyone who has to ' renegotiate' with VM each year. I bet most of their customers don't realise they can negotiate and there's such a thing as being 'out of contract'. Dread to think what I'd be paying if I'd never negotiated over the last 20 years...

However they are all at it, insurance companies the worst. Autorenew and direct debits aren't for your benefit. It's a pain, but you have to quibble each year and don't let things renew with inflated premiums, most don't bother. You could say 'buyer beware' but most are being totally ripped off and it needs sorting out. It's the vulnerable/elderly that get most hit by this.

SnoopZ 19-12-2018 11:52

Re: Loyalty costs many a lot
 
The problem with moving from VM broadband is usually a vast reduction of speed and with possibly having to move the phone line too.

RichardCoulter 19-12-2018 13:50

Re: Loyalty costs many a lot
 
According to todays ITV lunchtime news, the bad news is that those of us who receive discounts are likely to lose them to pay for reductions to customers who don't negotiate a lower price.

They also said that they want to ensure that TV contracts are as easy to leave as they are to join, which is exactly what i'll be doing if they try to charge me the full listed prices.

It wasn't made clear if this meant effectively abolishing contracts or removing the loopholes/obstacles that companies put in place to prevent customers leaving.

nomadking 19-12-2018 13:57

Re: Loyalty costs many a lot
 
Unless the number of new customers each year is substantial compared to the existing customer base, then any proposed changes will make little or no difference to the prices. The ones that would lose out would be new customers.


If these moronic regulators are going to adopt these principles, then surely they should insist that non-big six energy suppliers should also have the "green" taxes applied to them. Essentially they don't have them in order to attract new customers. What is the real difference. Then you have the continuing problem of new energy suppliers setting up with cheap rates to attract customers and then going bust because of it.

---------- Post added at 13:57 ---------- Previous post was at 13:54 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 35976057)
According to todays ITV lunchtime news, the bad news is that those of us who receive discounts are likely to lose them to pay for reductions to customers who don't negotiate a lower price.

They also said that they want to ensure that TV contracts are as easy to leave as they are to join, which is exactly what i'll be doing if they try to charge me the full listed prices.

It wasn't made clear if this meant effectively abolishing contracts or removing the loopholes/obstacles that companies put in place to prevent customers leaving.

It costs money for companies to install with new customers. If those costs are not spread over the length of the minimum contract period then there would have to be large upfront costs instead. Do these people live in the real world?

djfunkdup 19-12-2018 15:02

Re: Loyalty costs many a lot
 
I'm perfectly happy to pay the full price for my Vivid 350 as advertised on the website . i don't feel like i'm being ripped off in anyway ,in fact i'v said many times before on these forums BB is too cheap as it is !!

OLD BOY 19-12-2018 15:26

Re: Loyalty costs many a lot
 
I don't agree with the way loyal customers are treated, but there has been enough publicity about this, so I guess you now have the choice of whether or not to get ripped off.

RichardCoulter 19-12-2018 17:29

Re: Loyalty costs many a lot
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 35976058)
Unless the number of new customers each year is substantial compared to the existing customer base, then any proposed changes will make little or no difference to the prices. The ones that would lose out would be new customers.


If these moronic regulators are going to adopt these principles, then surely they should insist that non-big six energy suppliers should also have the "green" taxes applied to them. Essentially they don't have them in order to attract new customers. What is the real difference. Then you have the continuing problem of new energy suppliers setting up with cheap rates to attract customers and then going bust because of it.

---------- Post added at 13:57 ---------- Previous post was at 13:54 ----------

It costs money for companies to install with new customers. If those costs are not spread over the length of the minimum contract period then there would have to be large upfront costs instead. Do these people live in the real world?

I don't think that the concept of minimum contracts will be changed tbh, I think they were referring to how easy they make it to join, yet they make it difficult to cancel.

nomadking 19-12-2018 18:09

Re: Loyalty costs many a lot
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 35976083)
I don't think that the concept of minimum contracts will be changed tbh, I think they were referring to how easy they make it to join, yet they make it difficult to cancel.

The whole point about a contract is that it shouldn't be too easy to leave. Otherwise there is little point in having a contract.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:17.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum