Ten 300 Mbps locations confirmed
 

Kirknewton (West Lothian)
Houston, Crosslee, Craigends and Brookfield (Renfrewshire)
Bridge of Weir (Renfrewshire)
Ratby (Leicestershire)
Wilsden (West Yorkshire)
Kilmacolm (Inverclyde)
Stoke Poges (Buckinghamshire)
Lightwater (Surrey)
Hartley Wintney and Phoenix Green (Hampshire)
Oakley (Dorset)
http://www.broadbandtvnews.com/2016/...-supercharged/

Re: Ten 300 Mbps locations confirmed
 

Not just 300meg but these will all be fttp.

Re: Ten 300 Mbps locations confirmed
 

Wilsden (West Yorkshire)

lol so they are testing people in a village just outside of Bradford.

What do they hope to gain from testing it in a village with a small number of people

Re: Ten 300 Mbps locations confirmed
 

Exactly the same as if they tested it anywhere else, what diferrence does it make ?

Re: Ten 300 Mbps locations confirmed
 

They aren't testing anything. This is an extension to the Virgin Media network, and the areas selected were based on the number of interested people in those communities.

http://about.virginmedia.com/press-r...tainment-boost

Re: Ten 300 Mbps locations confirmed
 

Testing something on a handful of people isn't the same as testing it on a bigger town or a city. Not if those people they are testing it on are only checking emails or watching the odd netflix program.

Re: Ten 300 Mbps locations confirmed
 

Jealous much? :P

Who are you to say what those people will do with it, just because they live in a small villiage?

There's far more to this than just the number of people served, for all you know there's a node right next to the village that would make the cost of deployment relatively cheap. For all you know, they're testing what the costs of a small village deployment will be in case it makes sense to target other villages instead of large cities. Maybe the small number is ideal for Virgin because it allows them to trial FTTP without having to serve thousands of people. For all you know, it's cheaper to deploy it to this village because there's a lot less red tape compared to some large metropolis.

Either way, they don't just throw darts at a map, you can guarantee that these 10 places have been picked for a reason.

Re: Ten 300 Mbps locations confirmed
 

Population 4807 (thank you, Wikipedia). Not exactly a small village.

Re: Ten 300 Mbps locations confirmed
 

because its cheap, but sounds good in the media.

Re: Ten 300 Mbps locations confirmed
 

It's not a test. The test was done well over a year ago in Papworth, Cambridgeshire.

Since then fttp has been deployed in Leicestershire and now to these other areas.

This is to reinforce the idea that if you get enough people to sign up then they'll build it.

Re: Ten 300 Mbps locations confirmed
 

It doesn't matter where it's deployed there will always be those that complain because they can't get it ATM.

It's the whole spoilt brat approach.

"I want it and I want it NOW!"

Re: Ten 300 Mbps locations confirmed
 

Given that's what most people do with their connections if this were a test it would make sense to do it in such areas.

Re: Ten 300 Mbps locations confirmed
 

Papwoth was a trial, it wasn't based on customer demand, and penetration was pretty poor due to BT Infinity being in the area and VM billing system being a bit of an achilles heel as offers require a phone line.

If anyone with access experience will tell you, these areas they are building are within spitting distance of their existing network. I think cable my street enquiries have little influence in where they go. More a case of finding 2 spare fibres which are less than 1km dig from core network.

Re: Ten 300 Mbps locations confirmed
 

My younger sister living in Wilsden will not complain at all!
Currently using BT wet string.

Re: Ten 300 Mbps locations confirmed
 

Surely if VM (or any other provider) has enough interest for a service which makes it financially viable they will do it.