Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Virgin Media Internet Service (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=12)
-   -   Superhub : Upload speeds (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33698696)

DOT COTTON 01-09-2014 18:05

Upload speeds
 
Does anyone know why vm can offer high download speeds but the likes of BT can offer higher upload speeds than VM?
thank you
MRS C

BenMcr 01-09-2014 18:10

Re: Upload speeds
 
Uploads are tied to the service tier - the current fastest upload of 12Mbit is available as part of the 152Mbit tier.

DOT COTTON 01-09-2014 18:12

Re: Upload speeds
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BenMcr (Post 35725816)
Uploads are tied to the service tier - the current fastest upload of 12Mbit is available as part of the 152Mbit tier.

What do you mean by service tier.

Jayrull I 01-09-2014 18:14

Re: Upload speeds
 
The highest available is 12Mbps on the 152Mbps package.

I've heard on various forums that VM follow a 10:1 ratio policy for their downloads:uploads but I am not sure if this is true.

As I need a higher upload I have invested in dual connections one from Talk Talk and one from Virgin using a load balanced router which gives me around 30Mbps.

There's no point getting a business connection from any ISP as they are too expensive for my needs.

qasdfdsaq 01-09-2014 18:37

Re: Upload speeds
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DOT COTTON (Post 35725814)
Does anyone know why vm can offer high download speeds but the likes of BT can offer higher upload speeds than VM? thank you MRS C

Different technology.

DOT COTTON 01-09-2014 18:49

Re: Upload speeds
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq (Post 35725826)
Different technology.

But I thought they were both Fibre impact ?

Jayrull I 01-09-2014 19:00

Re: Upload speeds
 
They aren't both "true fibre" as their is still some copper/coaxial involved.

BT and other ISP's who use BT's network: The customers internet connection is fibre from the exchange until the green cabinet on the street, from then on it uses copper to the house.

Virgin's cable network utilises fibre then coaxial I believe in the last bit of the connection to the customers property.

qasdfdsaq 01-09-2014 20:42

Re: Upload speeds
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DOT COTTON (Post 35725827)
But I thought they were both Fibre impact ?

Different kinds of fibre.

Kushan 01-09-2014 20:49

Re: Upload speeds
 
BT is fibre to a node (Cabinet), then raw copper after (sometimes just aluminium). The copper also has to support a regular phone line so various technologies are put in place to make the most of the "unused" part of the cable. That technology is capable of supporting higher upload speeds, but the side effect is how quickly both download/upload speeds diminish over distance due to the unshielded nature of the copper.

Virgin uses fibre to a node (Cabinet) but even at this level the technologies are different. After that, they differ even more, going forward in a shielded coaxial cable (still copper, but very different cable). The technologies in play here are geared towards maximising the available bandwidth in that copper cable but in a way that it doesn't diminish over distance. The side effect of this is that your speeds don't quite diminish over distance but you don't get much bandwidth in the "upstream" direction compared to the downstream.

TL;DR

Quote:

Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq (Post 35725826)
Different technology.


craigj2k12 07-09-2014 06:02

Re: Upload speeds
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kushan (Post 35725856)
Virgin uses fibre to a node (Cabinet) but even at this level the technologies are different. After that, they differ even more, going forward in a shielded coaxial cable (still copper, but very different cable). The technologies in play here are geared towards maximising the available bandwidth in that copper cable but in a way that it doesn't diminish over distance. The side effect of this is that your speeds don't quite diminish over distance but you don't get much bandwidth in the "upstream" direction compared to the downstream.

Well thats not a side effect of the coax itself

Kushan 07-09-2014 15:21

Re: Upload speeds
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by craigj2k12 (Post 35727045)
Well thats not a side effect of the coax itself

Not at all, didn't mean to imply that either.

craigj2k12 08-09-2014 02:09

Re: Upload speeds
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kushan (Post 35727141)
Not at all, didn't mean to imply that either.

https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2014/09/12.gif

Ignitionnet 08-09-2014 12:52

Re: Upload speeds
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DOT COTTON (Post 35725814)
Does anyone know why vm can offer high download speeds but the likes of BT can offer higher upload speeds than VM?
thank you
MRS C

Offering higher upload speeds will cost VM money. It's on the list but isn't a high priority for them, most people still focus on download speeds.

qasdfdsaq 09-09-2014 13:02

Re: Upload speeds
 
Shock horror, VM putting off doing something because it'll cost them money... Haven't you just spent the last few months berating Openreach because of... putting off doing things because it'll cost them money?

Upload costs both networks money tbh, since any capacity used for upload is capacity that must be removed from download use in both cases. It's easier to do for one company, but still degrades their headline download speeds.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:27.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum