Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   What a nerve for Mr Hague (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33692417)

Arthurgray50@blu 10-03-2013 19:55

What a nerve for Mr Hague
 
http://news.sky.com/story/1062582/mu...ges-criticised

It always makes me laugh with the Tory party, they want to hit the mothers in the UK with my cuts.

Yet., Mr Hague is going to give Syria £20 million pounds of our money to supply weapons, for which is nothing to do with this country.:mad:

Cobbydaler 10-03-2013 20:24

Re: What a nerve for Mr Hague
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu (Post 35546717)
http://news.sky.com/story/1062582/mu...ges-criticised

It always makes me laugh with the Tory party, they want to hit the mothers in the UK with my cuts.

Yet., Mr Hague is going to give Syria £20 million pounds of our money to supply weapons, for which is nothing to do with this country.:mad:

Congrats for another working link Arthur.

My salary has not increased in line with inflation for the last 5 years. Why should benefits?

Chris 10-03-2013 20:25

Re: What a nerve for Mr Hague
 
I refer members to my standard right-of-centre response to this issue.

Derek 10-03-2013 20:32

Re: What a nerve for Mr Hague
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu (Post 35546717)
It always makes me laugh with the Tory party, they want to hit the mothers in the UK with my cuts.

My wages have dropped over the last year. Why should benefits automatically increase at or above inflation every year when wages don't?

Osem 10-03-2013 20:34

Re: What a nerve for Mr Hague
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cobbydaler (Post 35546732)
Congrats for another working link Arthur.

My salary has not increased in line with inflation for the last 5 years. Why should benefits?

... because people like Arthur (and 'prudent' Labour Chancellors) can't see beyond their rose tinted specs and wouldn't recognise economic reality if it stood up and slapped them in the face. Let's face it mate, your 'job' is to carry on working hard for less so people like Arthur can carry on moaning about their subsidised rent and blaming everything under the sun on those who inherited Labour's legacy and are having to deal with it.

TheDaddy 10-03-2013 21:35

Re: What a nerve for Mr Hague
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35546740)
... because people like Arthur (and 'prudent' Labour Chancellors) can't see beyond their rose tinted specs and wouldn't recognise economic reality if it stood up and slapped them in the face. Let's face it mate, your 'job' is to carry on working hard for less so people like Arthur can carry on moaning about their subsidised rent and blaming everything under the sun on those who inherited Labour's legacy and are having to deal with it.

Who is subsidising Arthur's rent, he has a full time job iirc

Pierre 10-03-2013 21:40

Re: What a nerve for Mr Hague
 
That link, unless I missed it, doesn't say anything about the government giving Syria 20 million, or what it would be for?

Osem 10-03-2013 21:42

Re: What a nerve for Mr Hague
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 35546764)
Who is subsidising Arthur's rent, he has a full time job iirc

He lives in a council property IIRC. If so, hence subsidised.

GrimUpNorth 10-03-2013 22:07

Re: What a nerve for Mr Hague
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35546772)
He lives in a council property IIRC. If so, hence subsidised.

Now I don't know the answer, but if Arthur is paying 'full' rent- i.e. no housing benefit, is he being subsidised or is he actually paying the true price? I note he mentioned in another thread that he's paying £180/week, which if you consider annual increases, then I'm sure he won't be that far off paying for the property over say the next 20 years. People seem to forget that the property would still be owned by the council and can be rented out to another tenent in years to come. If during the 'life' of a council property the 'full' rent is payed then the property will probably have been paid for many times over. There's something to be said for supplying affordable housing in high cost areas.

Cheers

Grim

Osem 10-03-2013 22:33

Re: What a nerve for Mr Hague
 
Let's be clear, I dpn't have a problem with council houses - I wish there were more of them. I have a problem with some people expecting others, who're also suffering in these hard times, to pay more than they already do in order that benefits etc. can increase faster than salaries.

Stuart 10-03-2013 22:55

Re: What a nerve for Mr Hague
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 35546733)
I refer members to my standard right-of-centre response to this issue.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Derek (Post 35546739)
My wages have dropped over the last year. Why should benefits automatically increase at or above inflation every year when wages don't?

Another way of looking at it is that Government is repeatedly introducing cuts that penalise those who are at the bottom end of the pay scale while seemingly ignoring the measures taken by those at the top end of the pay scale to minimise the amount of tax paid (and I am talking about both individuals and companies). Tax which can amount to 100s of millions of pounds.

The government can reduce the debt in two ways. Decrease expenditure (which is what they are trying) or increase income. This is a concept that, frankly, seems to escape the Tories, as well as the Liberal Democrats.

Sirius 10-03-2013 22:59

Re: What a nerve for Mr Hague
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Derek (Post 35546739)
My wages have dropped over the last year. Why should benefits automatically increase at or above inflation every year when wages don't?

Indeed

what about those of us that don't get benefits and don't get a pay rise, So what should we do as we cannot go to the benefits office for more.

Osem 10-03-2013 23:02

Re: What a nerve for Mr Hague
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Stuart (Post 35546788)
Another way of looking at it is that Government is repeatedly introducing cuts that penalise those who are at the bottom end of the pay scale while seemingly ignoring the measures taken by those at the top end of the pay scale to minimise the amount of tax paid (and I am talking about both individuals and companies). Tax which can amount to 100s of millions of pounds.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-20559791

Quote:

An HMRC spokesman said: "We relentlessly challenge those that persist in avoiding tax and have recovered £29bn additional revenues from large businesses in the last six years, including £4.1bn in the last four years from transfer pricing enquiries alone."
http://www.fda.org.uk/Media/Whats-ne...tra-3.7bn.aspx

Quote:

"HMRC is on track to deliver an additional £7 billion in tax receipts each year to 2015 as part of the Coalition's £917 million "reinvestment" programme"
It might seem like that to some but I'm not sure these figures amount to ignoring the problem. Although there's no doubt more could be done, it has to be done within the law and legal challenges can take a very long time to resolve in matters as complex as these.

martyh 10-03-2013 23:02

Re: What a nerve for Mr Hague
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35546781)
Let's be clear, I dpn't have a problem with council houses - I wish there were more of them. I have a problem with some people expecting others, who're also suffering in these hard times, to pay more than they already do in order that benefits etc. can increase faster than salaries.

It really bugs the crap out of me when people on benefits are moaning they are only getting 1% pay rise per year ,or should that be the Labour party are moaning on their behalf ? because i would hate it if someone in receipt of benefits moaned to me that they are only getting a 1% rise because then i would have to smack in the face with my ever decreasing pay packets

Sirius 10-03-2013 23:08

Re: What a nerve for Mr Hague
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35546796)
It really bugs the crap out of me when people on benefits are moaning they are only getting 1% pay rise per year ,or should that be the Labour party are moaning on their behalf ? because i would hate it if someone in receipt of benefits moaned to me that they are only getting a 1% rise because then i would have to smack in the face with my ever decreasing pay packets

:clap:


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 17:38.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum