![]() |
Which costs more? Tax evasion or Benefit Fraud?
The answer might surprise you.. http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisf...-tax-avoidance
Now, I know the source is a left-wing newspaper, but it does make some interesting points. Successive governments (from ALL parties) have been telling us that millions of people are abusing their benefits, and making loud noises about reducing that fraud while seemingly ignoring the evasion (both legal and illegal) that happens at the other end of the scale. According to the DWP's official estimates, welfare fraud is currently around £1.2billion a year. Compare this to the fact that even the most conservative estimate places tax evasion at about £5bn a year. Also consider the fact that HMRC estimates that the gap between what it is paid and what it thinks it is owed is £30bn. Personally, I think the Government needs to take a long, hard look at both the Welfare system and the Tax system. They are both bloated and overcomplicated. Something which leaves them both open to abuse. Unfortunately, I doubt it will ever happen. To many MPs appear to be taking advantage of the loopholes to reduce their own tax bills. |
Re: Which costs more? Tax evasion or Benefit Fraud?
Quote:
|
Re: Which costs more? Tax evasion or Benefit Fraud?
Quote:
|
Re: Which costs more? Tax evasion or Benefit Fraud?
Quote:
|
Re: Which costs more? Tax evasion or Benefit Fraud?
What will happen re the tax loopholes is that they will never be closed ,instead HMRC will investigate fully and eventually catch a few that are using loopholes illegally but the investigations will take so long and cost so much as to negate any benefit in the investigation
|
Re: Which costs more? Tax evasion or Benefit Fraud?
Quote:
|
Re: Which costs more? Tax evasion or Benefit Fraud?
I was reading the other day of serious system which agressively tax issue with netherlands.
That this one needs to be stopped. http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2...ms-going-dutch I also was reading that 4 main tax companies denying helping businesses aggressive tax avoidance schemes. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/9...t-Britain.html Now dont deny companies employ clever people but cant get my head around the denial. So who is advicing and enacting these aggressive tax avoidance schemes if the big 4 angels. Should we go further as something stinks high evans. |
Re: Which costs more? Tax evasion or Benefit Fraud?
Quote:
http://arstechnica.com/business/2013...n-tax-evasion/ |
Re: Which costs more? Tax evasion or Benefit Fraud?
Quote:
Good news on that if its closed. |
Re: Which costs more? Tax evasion or Benefit Fraud?
This is why we need a simpler tax system. Easier to follow, easier to police and easier to enforce with any 'acceptable'* forms of avoidance (as opposed to evasion which is already illegal) and reliefs unequivocally defined.
There's also the question of which (benefit fraud or tax evasion/avoidance) is easier to control/enforce. Unpalatable as it is, rich people and companies can currently construct and complicate their activities to take full advantage of any loopholes and it's incredibly time consuming and expensive to unravel them. This means that any savings made in recovered tax have to be offset against the costs and there's always the possibility that HMRC will lose in court and the taxpayer have to foot the bill. A simpler benefits system would help reduce fraud and confirm/deny entitlement and that's what's currently being worked upon isn't it? * e.g. ISA's & pension tax relief designed to encourage saving. |
Re: Which costs more? Tax evasion or Benefit Fraud?
Quote:
|
Re: Which costs more? Tax evasion or Benefit Fraud?
Quote:
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:51. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum