![]() |
Sky admits to oversubscription
Just to prove that these can happen to all ISPs:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/01...apacity_after/ Quote:
|
Re: Sky admits to oversubscription
Well nobody is perfect. :(
Although it is disappointing to hear, from what I deduce from my, admittedly, short time with Sky BB they are relatively quick to provide extra capacity. Unlike certain other providers who can take forever to relieve congestion in certain areas, particularly those areas with a large student component. ;) In the meantime my SkyFibrePro remains rock solid and performs as per my sig. :) |
Re: Sky admits to oversubscription
someones popular :LOL:
|
Re: Sky admits to oversubscription
Mod comment - play nicely, boys and girls....
|
Re: Sky admits to oversubscription
Quote:
Sky seemed to have been honest and admitted the problems along with a fix time a few weeks away. If you look at the register article you will see one of the affected areas is Bristol and there is a very good reason for that. Virgin customers have been switching to other isp's in the area big time due to massive problems which have taken forever to fix. They claimed to the Bristol advertiser that it was just 8 nodes in the area and it would be fixed by the end of December. Now they have had to admit that the problem is bigger and they are still trying to fix it now after 6 months. This VM Bristol thread was created after months of problems and is still going, 120 pages later. Virgin have lost a lot of customers due to oversubscription and Sky will do the same if they have as many as virgin and take as long to fix them as Virgin do. The article would suggest Sky will be fixing these problems about 4 or 5 months quicker than it would take Virgin though ;) |
Re: Sky admits to oversubscription
I think it's fair to say that customers of ANY company will sometimes have problems. The real test of that company is how they deal with with those customers, and how quickly those problems are resolved.
I suspect all ISPs have capacity problems from time to time, but we hear more about Virgin because a) they serve more customers and b) we are primarily a forum for Virgin Media customers. |
Re: Sky admits to oversubscription
Quote:
|
Re: Sky admits to oversubscription
Quote:
|
Re: Sky admits to oversubscription
Quote:
|
Re: Sky admits to oversubscription
MMmmm I used to be with NTL and still would be if I could get it. The only option would be offnet - but that's pretty dire so BT is best for me at the moment. Still when I move I hope to get cable broadband again.
Oversubscription - well I'm sure most if not all isp's have had this problem. |
Re: Sky admits to oversubscription
Quote:
|
Re: Sky admits to oversubscription
Quote:
|
Re: Sky admits to oversubscription
Quote:
|
Re: Sky admits to oversubscription
Hmmm.., Just had a thought.
The vast majority of Sky's BB services are totally unmanaged while all of VM's BB services are extremely managed with not one but two systems. One wonders if Sky employed the same extreme network management techniques as VM would Sky still be suffering over capacity problems? No way to know for sure but their is a good possibility they would not. As the BB services offered by these two providers are so different a direct comparison is not possible. The only valid comparison is how responsive the relevent company is to: Admitting they have an issue and what it is. Fixing the issue in an acceptable timeframe. From what I see and hear Sky appear to be winning hands down. |
Re: Sky admits to oversubscription
Quote:
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 19:30. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum