Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Virgin Media Internet Service (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=12)
-   -   50M : Is Super Hub not so Super? (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33689193)

The Yank 11-08-2012 11:44

Is Super Hub not so Super?
 
I have a 50MB connection with a Super Hub modem/Router. I only recently got myself a Tablet and tried connecting up in my bedroom but got no single. I find this strange as I get a perfectly good signal in my lounge immediately below my bedroom (using the same tablet). I find this very frustrating as the distance can't be more than 20/30 feet.

Isn't this what a router is designed to do?

jb66 11-08-2012 12:23

Re: Is Super Hub not so Super?
 
yeah its crap

Sephiroth 11-08-2012 13:00

Re: Is Super Hub not so Super?
 
A decent wireless router is designed to do what you want. But the SH is a wretched piece of router junk. It has two postage stamp sized plates in exactly the wrong place facing the wrong way in a most beautifully crafted useless box. Tis thing will never do what you need for wireless (although it might for others who are in the same room as this thing).

Modem mode and your own wireless router is the only answer. But think about the router you buy and read up on its wireless legs. For an upstairs/downstairs thing, there are variables. A router with an external antenna pair/trio would to a better job than one with internal antennae.

Hope that helps.

Cyni_cal 11-08-2012 13:06

Re: Is Super Hub not so Super?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jb66 (Post 35462132)
yeah its crap

Short and sweet, I like that.

20/30ft peoples expectations are just unbelievable.:erm:

vmfriend 11-08-2012 13:13

Re: Is Super Hub not so Super?
 
Wireless performance depends on what is between you and the hub, for example walls and ceilings, depending on thickness can affect performance.

Not related to the OP but can we close this thread now because the nay sayers have had their say, with a few notable exceptions and it will just turn into another 'the superhub is crap, no it isn't debate'

Cyni_cal 11-08-2012 13:36

Re: Is Super Hub not so Super?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 35462141)
A decent wireless router is designed to do what you want. But the SH is a wretched piece of router junk. It has two postage stamp sized plates in exactly the wrong place facing the wrong way in a most beautifully crafted useless box. Tis thing will never do what you need for wireless (although it might for others who are in the same room as this thing).

Modem mode and your own wireless router is the only answer. But think about the router you buy and read up on its wireless legs. For an upstairs/downstairs thing, there are variables. A router with an external antenna pair/trio would to a better job than one with internal antennae.

Hope that helps.

Yeah, the orientation of this thing is critical, just a few cm one way or the other can make all the difference. Even standing a reflective surface at right angles to the end where the lights are can increase coverage. Not distance. I like ****ing about like that. A leftover from my RHam days when you had to sort your own problems.
Or as the man says get a decent router and put the junk into modem mode.

---------- Post added at 14:36 ---------- Previous post was at 14:24 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by vmfriend (Post 35462146)
Wireless performance depends on what is between you and the hub, for example walls and ceilings, depending on thickness can affect performance.

Not related to the OP but can we close this thread now because the nay sayers have had their say, with a few notable exceptions and it will just turn into another 'the superhub is crap, no it isn't debate'

Oh dear! touchy, touchy, I suppose the notable exeptions will come on and tell us they have coverage when they where in Birmingham, and their Shub
was in London.:erm:

The Yank 11-08-2012 13:36

Re: Is Super Hub not so Super?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 35462141)
A decent wireless router is designed to do what you want. But the SH is a wretched piece of router junk. It has two postage stamp sized plates in exactly the wrong place facing the wrong way in a most beautifully crafted useless box. Tis thing will never do what you need for wireless (although it might for others who are in the same room as this thing).

Modem mode and your own wireless router is the only answer. But think about the router you buy and read up on its wireless legs. For an upstairs/downstairs thing, there are variables. A router with an external antenna pair/trio would to a better job than one with internal antennae.

Hope that helps.

I kinda like the idea of the single box rather than a separate modem + a separate router. I also thought I probably was tied into the VM offering. Is there an alternative I can but then? and more importantly is it easy for a non techy to setup?;)

Cyni_cal 11-08-2012 13:44

Re: Is Super Hub not so Super?
 
You've no choice, it's the Shub plus router or just the Shub.

Sephiroth 11-08-2012 13:50

Re: Is Super Hub not so Super?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by The Yank (Post 35462156)
I kinda like the idea of the single box rather than a separate modem + a separate router. I also thought I probably was tied into the VM offering. Is there an alternative I can but then? and more importantly is it easy for a non techy to setup?;)

I can't disagree with what you say. But VM don't allow/offer a higher end Gateway (Motorola for example). The SH is what you must eat and that's it.

VM have been asked for the past 1½ years to provide a paid-for decent alternative but there has been no rresponse from them on that as yet.

A shame - because their broadband offering is otherwise very good IMO.

---------- Post added at 14:50 ---------- Previous post was at 14:45 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by vmfriend (Post 35462146)
Wireless performance depends on what is between you and the hub, for example walls and ceilings, depending on thickness can affect performance.
[SEPH]: The SH is between you and the antennae. Have you looked inside?

Not related to the OP but can we close this thread now because the nay sayers have had their say, with a few notable exceptions and it will just turn into another 'the superhub is crap, no it isn't debate'
[SEPH]: The thread is young and it poses a valid question.

Why would you want to suppress this truth?




The Yank 11-08-2012 14:06

Re: Is Super Hub not so Super?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyni_cal (Post 35462161)
You've no choice, it's the Shub plus router or just the Shub.

I have a Netgear router somewhere (the one I used before the SH). Is it just a case of connecting the two together? Is it as easy as that?

vmfriend 11-08-2012 14:10

Re: Is Super Hub not so Super?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyni_cal (Post 35462150)
Yeah, the orientation of this thing is critical, just a few cm one way or the other can make all the difference. Even standing a reflective surface at right angles to the end where the lights are can increase coverage. Not distance. I like ****ing about like that. A leftover from my RHam days when you had to sort your own problems.
Or as the man says get a decent router and put the junk into modem mode.

---------- Post added at 14:36 ---------- Previous post was at 14:24 ----------



Oh dear! touchy, touchy, I suppose the notable exeptions will come on and tell us they have coverage when they where in Birmingham, and their Shub
was in London.:erm:

Nothing touchy about it, the same people keep posting the same thing (and I would include myself in that) and there isn't anything new in this thread that hasn't been discussed already.[COLOR="Silver"]

---------- Post added at 15:10 ---------- Previous post was at 15:06 ----------

@Seph

No conspiracy here :D

It's just tedious when the same thing is in every thread about the Superhub, I appreciate that some think it's crap and others don't, it would just be nice for a change for the 'advice' which is generally good on here, to be given without starting 'another' the Superhub is crap no it isn't discussion.

The personal disagreements seem to get in the way of the point being discussed which is a shame.

Peter_ 11-08-2012 14:11

Re: Is Super Hub not so Super?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyni_cal (Post 35462150)





Oh dear! touchy, touchy, I suppose the notable exeptions will come on and tell us they have coverage when they where in Birmingham, and their Shub
was in London.:erm:

Clueless to the end.https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2012/11/13.gif

Skie 11-08-2012 16:51

Re: Is Super Hub not so Super?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by vmfriend (Post 35462146)
Wireless performance depends on what is between you and the hub, for example walls and ceilings, depending on thickness can affect performance.

And for the superhub it has difficulty with even small quantities of nitrogen and oxygen :dozey:

Superblade7 11-08-2012 19:13

Re: Is Super Hub not so Super?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by The Yank (Post 35462175)
I have a Netgear router somewhere (the one I used before the SH). Is it just a case of connecting the two together? Is it as easy as that?

It is really simple Yank, you just need to select modem mode in the Super Hub settings and connect your existing router. For assistance check out this link - http://help.virginmedia.com/system/s...MER_TYPE=Cable

Hope you sort it, Superblade7

The Yank 11-08-2012 19:46

Re: Is Super Hub not so Super?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Superblade7 (Post 35462299)
It is really simple Yank, you just need to select modem mode in the Super Hub settings and connect your existing router. For assistance check out this link - http://help.virginmedia.com/system/s...MER_TYPE=Cable

Hope you sort it, Superblade7

thx


All times are GMT. The time now is 20:49.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum