Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Virgin Media Internet Service (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=12)
-   -   Superhub : Superhub2 (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33688790)

jempalmer 17-07-2012 18:52

Superhub2
 
I had an interesting phone call today. I have a replacement Superhub which I have not yet activated (given that it will probably still be on R30). The person with whom I spoke told me that there will be a Superhub 2, still in development. As with anything that any of we are told, I am natuarlly a little sceptical. Anyone with further info? :erm:

thenry 17-07-2012 19:04

Re: Superhub2
 
its true. qas posted some info a while back.

jempalmer 17-07-2012 19:15

Re: Superhub2
 
Apparently they're "sorting out the details". I did search CF for related threads. It will be interesting to see if they'll simply write off the Shub or replace the million plus out there. The guy that I spoke to was unsure as to whether it was a Netgear product. All he said was that it will have upgraded antennae. We'll see.

General Maximus 17-07-2012 19:36

Re: Superhub2
 
it will still be whatever is the cheapest and they wont replace all the shubs just like they havent replaced all the vmng300s. To start off with it will be new customer installations and then it will be swap overs for tech visits

jempalmer 17-07-2012 19:40

Re: Superhub2
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by General Maximus (Post 35453620)
it will still be whatever is the cheapest and they wont replace all the shubs just like they havent replaced all the vmng300s. To start off with it will be new customer installations and then it will be swap overs for tech visits

Oh dear, deja vu. Going to bed now to plot. It does rather aggravate one though. :mad:

General Maximus 17-07-2012 19:52

Re: Superhub2
 
i just hope that the new one can use 16 channels

Peter_ 17-07-2012 19:53

Re: Superhub2
 
They have already tested a Superhub 2 last year which would have been the VMDG485 built Huawei but it was an abject failure.

They then were supposed to have been testing a Superhub 3 which would have been the VMDG487 but strangely that went quiet as well, they said that they were considering external antenna only if it did not spoil the aesthetics look of the device otherwise they would go with internal.

The above I read on the intranet before taking my redundancy.

Whatever type of device appears they will not replace the existing devices on the network as the majority actually work on the average connection so do not expect to get one if one ever appears on the scene.

I also rather doubt that they will grow a pair and buy a mainstream device already in use by millions around the world because that would be them admitting that they screwed up by supplying both the VMNG300 and then the VMDG480 as realistically they are both junk and not truly fit for purpose in comparison to say a Motorola SBG900/1 series device.

thenry 17-07-2012 20:03

Re: Superhub2
 
its never too late. they could do it. like you say the majority of customers wont know the ins and outs and those that know will happily fork out for qaulity kit. those that dont can stick with the current SuperHub. simple.

Peter_ 17-07-2012 20:06

Re: Superhub2
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by thenry (Post 35453637)
its never too late. they could do it. like you say the majority of customers wont know the ins and outs and those that know will happily fork out for qaulity kit. those that dont can stick with the current SuperHub. simple.

I cannot see it happening as no one is going to admit to such a major flop and I would not hold your breath in hope either, they tested mainstream devices then went for the junk which smells of underhand dealing rather than stupidity and to resolve this would probably mean heads rolling.

thenry 17-07-2012 20:09

Re: Superhub2
 
they dont need to admit to anything though. just sell the higher tiers.

jempalmer 17-07-2012 20:09

Re: Superhub2
 
Apparently the Bshs 2 is still a Netgear device. Upgraded antennae? Firmware?

General Maximus 17-07-2012 20:27

Re: Superhub2
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_ (Post 35453632)
because that would be them admitting that they screwed up by supplying both the VMNG300 and then the VMDG480

what's wrong with my vmng300?

Peter_ 17-07-2012 20:33

Re: Superhub2
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by General Maximus (Post 35453653)
what's wrong with my vmng300?

Compared to what they actually tested it is a piece of junk as the other devices could run 8 downstreams and are used worldwide by millions of users without incident.

Put it this way if you were offered a state of the art device such as the Motorola above you would bite their hand off and once it was installed you would wonder why you put up the the VMNG300 for so long.

We want racehorses on our desks not the camels foisted on us by Virginmedia, as the old saying goes you cannot polish manure ( replace with word of choice )

thenry 17-07-2012 20:44

Re: Superhub2
 
they tried by giving it a shiny finish :p:

General Maximus 17-07-2012 21:19

Re: Superhub2
 
I am not a Motorola fan, it is a poor man's Cisco


All times are GMT. The time now is 13:37.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum