![]() |
sky movies (excess profits)
anyone see the article about sky movies making excess proffits ?
The Competition Commission has said BSkyB is making "excess profits" on its movie channels, increasing the likelihood that the company could be forced to change the way it does business with Hollywood studios and rival broadcasters. |
Re: sky movies (excess profits)
Quote:
Linkage HERE Sky is making "excessive profits" from its Sky Movies service, the UK's competition regulator has said, hinting at potential forthcoming reform of the pay-TV films market. Quote:
|
Re: sky movies (excess profits)
Quote:
|
Re: sky movies (excess profits)
its about time something was done and hopefully sky get to reudce the price it charges to other broadcasters !
|
Re: sky movies (excess profits)
We in the UK will never have a truly level playing field for other pay TV operators until Sky are stopped from cornering the market, sports and movies are dominated by Sky giving the likes of VM and BT little chance of setting up rival services.
The fact that Sky lock away the ON Demand rights because they are not capable of using them can't be right...I'm sure these excessive profits won't stop Sky from putting their premium service prices up yet again. |
Re: sky movies (excess profits)
another interesting quote from the article...
Quote:
|
Re: sky movies (excess profits)
And the likelyhood that the Conservatives upset Murdoch......nil!
|
Re: sky movies (excess profits)
Quote:
The competition commission is an independent organisation and as such the Tories have no influence over it's findings. They can veto them but to do so would be a major thing that would cause them all sorts of problems that I doubt they would want. Unlike Ofcom the CC can tell Sky to do what they want and it's legally binding beyond limiting what they can charge others etc. They could even break Sky up if they want to ensure proper competition:shocked: Here's hopping they do the right thing and at least take away Sky's VOD exclusives on movies. |
Re: sky movies (excess profits)
Quote:
My fear is, like with the events with Premier League football, is that we will end up with yet another subscription service like we did with Sky/Setanta and end up being lumbered with another separate susbscription. It's never seems cheaper for the end user but seems to satisfy the competition people, job done for them. I wonder how FilmFlex/Picturebox would react to yet another movie vendor being on VM like LoveFilm anyway? We'll see. |
Re: sky movies (excess profits)
Quote:
|
Re: sky movies (excess profits)
Totally agree with the past few posts, competition should work in the customers favour. Personally I preferred when all football etc was on SKY Sports. All I had to worry about was 1 subscription, and everything I wanted to watch was in the 1 place. It's the same as the movie channels. Everything I want to watch is currently in my subscription. If things get broken up, and 2 or 3 different movie subscription channels are set up then I ain't going to be too happy.
|
Re: sky movies (excess profits)
Quote:
I remember all too well when some bright spark in the late 80's/early 90's decided ITV should be opened up and insisted viewers would all benefit and we ended up losing a wonderful broadcaster like Thames Television and 'benefitted' from the genius that was Carlton Television. Be careful what you wish for. |
Re: sky movies (excess profits)
Sky having a complete monopoly and charging too much for movies because of it isn't a good thing is it? Suggesting we customers shouldn't wish for something better is just what Sky wants.
|
Re: sky movies (excess profits)
Quote:
But exactly the same was said regarding Premier League football and all that happened was we had to subscribe to Sky and Setanta, and sadly it was later proven two separate services were unsustainable. People don't seem to want multiple subscriptions. If you want yet more separate subscriptions that will probably cost more then support these moves to the hilt, that's your choice. I would prefer for Sky's prices to be reviewed not so much their exclusivity, making them understand that exclusivity comes with responsibility. Having packages here, there and everywhere dosen't seem to benefit us financially. Price regulation of movies might though. In my opinion. |
Re: sky movies (excess profits)
So long as this and the other regulatory actions on both Sky and BT are taken as part permitting News Corp to get their hands on the other 61% of Sky, and that Virgin's network is opened up on an active and/or passive level I'm cool with it.
Regulation of unbalanced markets is just fine so long as it's not unbalancing them the other way. EDIT: We have one of the best pay TV packages anywhere, it's also one of the most expensive. There is always a concern however that we the customer will suffer in terms of quality of services in return for receiving them at a lower rate, just as happened with the highly regulated broadband market. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:53. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum