![]() |
Best NAS unit?
Currently looking at these two:
http://www.lg.com/uk/it-products/net...rage-N2R1D.jsp http://www.synology.com/enu/products/DS211j/index.php Really only want it for a centralised storage point for music & files to share between two or three laptops/PCs. Any advantages to the Synology? Seems very expensive for a bare unit with no storage, almost twice the price of the LG. |
Re: Best NAS unit?
The Synology scores major points by having a relatively fast CPU (1.2GHz), but it's not easy to compare with the LG as LG don't specify a CPU..
The Faster CPU means that it's more likely to be able to handle more users without any noticable drop in speed. 1.2Ghz may not sound a lot (when PCs are 2, 3 and even 4 Ghz), but bear in mind that the NAS is likely to be running a Linux clone (Linux, for all it's faults, is more resource efficient that Windows) and not likely to be running a virus checker. |
Re: Best NAS unit?
Appparently it's:
Processor clock speed 800MHz Processor Marvell 88F6192 So two thirds the speed, but not sure that's important for my needs. |
Re: Best NAS unit?
To be fair CPU speed is not really an issue for file sharing as it just uses so little. My mobile phone could easily saturate a wireless network (and probably a 100mbit ethernet network) if used for plain file serving. More complex stuff such as media streaming can use more but for music it's negligible.
Anyhow, I've not seen much mentioned about the LG units. Synology make nice compact units and are generally held in quite high regard. SR have a review of the 410j (slower, 4-disk version) here: http://www.storagereview.com/synolog..._ds410j_review just to give you an idea of the performance and interface. At the end of the day though, I wouldn't spend that much money on a NAS if you just want to share a bit of music and files between two laptops. Exactly how much are you going to be sharing and what will you be doing with it? It may be cheaper just to get a router with a USB port (if you don't have one already) and plug an external hard drive into it. You won't get as much performance but you could get a router + a 2TB hard drive for less than the price of the LG alone. Quote:
|
Re: Best NAS unit?
Looking at the LG: Why would you want (or pay for) a DVD burner in a NAS drive? The main thing I'd be looking at is support for additional USB drives.
|
Re: Best NAS unit?
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Best NAS unit?
The DS211j you linked has a 1.2Ghz, the DS410j in the review I posted has an 800Mhz (and still does over 400mbps with just that). As I say, the review is there just to give you a ballpark idea of the Synology units. The one you linked is newer and faster.
|
Re: Best NAS unit?
I'm a big fan of qnap - I have one of these : http://www.qnap.com/pro_detail_feature.asp?p_id=122
|
Re: Best NAS unit?
If you were after a cheap and cheerful NAS, I use the newish D-Link DNS-320 box with 2 2TB drives in. It streams at nearly 300Mb/s to my media streamer. For £70, I couldn't be more pleased!
|
Re: Best NAS unit?
Or if you have an old system You could try FreeNAS Though probably best if your old system is small, quiet and slimline if you don't have anywhere out of sight to hide it.
Most of the time it will work out cheaper with freeNAS and I would also say that most of the time its also a fair bit faster. Also features BitTorrent, uPnP, iTunes server as well as a lot of others. edit: I run my FreeNAS on a HP D530 USDT, P4 3GHZ HT, 512MB RAM with 1x2TB drive and 1x1TB drive linked in via a dual SATA USB enclosure. RAM seems to be stuck between 30% - 33% usage and I have never seen CPU go above 5% on each thread and I run BitTorrent on mine non-stop as well as serving blu-ray images to my media centre. |
Re: Best NAS unit?
Quote:
All I need to do now is move all the files I've stored on numerous DVD's, CD's and portable drives onto the NAS. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 21:24. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum